From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10EF1C52D7B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:22:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wWwr7zWATQuYFqeeYM1CqrF/gl5kEJAwbc6M3ZyF80g=; b=0tpcViXcVjUn+suFuK21pW3HPn rv1n6Vz/6NN73jClXcyzdK0U75OINkfGYoYwxnr6Q3mDj01k4MKN7ZnfMt8QHCbqb55Mj4mvdvTV9 RSYEqCD/sAclv0vtD+qH0j+OT0aejAd2t/Pbx98844509wnRtkao1y/oagNRw83//QyFfnx5hFbOy U1nj+e6t9SqzZ5G+0ARZHayBVvqIzCYP9rzvUTtqGq4wXVGl0Xk3unpkRZnw4Ri8kxg4FeP5XDQj0 SIA7lgwU8wur9ue+Us6pkdGEkXq6oYoREQOso7HDTd+AXsdT6XrTso55j5wn0U/JfM3gLBDVJ12Hz EbRGUgsg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1seFpU-00000007Sf3-091q; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:22:28 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1seFor-00000007Sbh-0ZkT; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:21:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wWwr7zWATQuYFqeeYM1CqrF/gl5kEJAwbc6M3ZyF80g=; b=22GQztV2mfG2u0Gc3jzzQSpO65 7VWKwbTO6qzTKqhrLh0IqCLyOlWjXl3mSnI+8B6yooUouFyQUKE/ZDwgwCOSw8rtfEyG9f79lRUaO owewVmJvWZ+S0wNt++i6JU9XJQdPMzhU2LZHSn7EaRy0nBccifQgaMjJIt/Mwc6aQD3g/E0qsM+pq ZYjg5gSRkHb38a/dNHs3CttvGLosNHUhYxJ2l/affw8kN7Oubw7nwTDDtCRF8D65TGYVaTCoCmnEk 5YhH/gVdXEBa9dWqFRckrU1i9EO8DfVXAHJS7b73xvVPG4dq+Oq0BohGfL6hP7Cb1JJsnojyhvZyi w2HyhxTg==; Received: from i53875a9f.versanet.de ([83.135.90.159] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1seFoV-0004yv-7N; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:21:27 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Yao Zi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Chris Morgan , Jonas Karlman , Tim Lunn , Andy Yan , Muhammed Efe Cetin , Jagan Teki , Dragan Simic , Ondrej Jirman , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3528 SoC Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:21:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2429972.SyXcmblsem@diego> In-Reply-To: <6320e4f3-e737-4787-8a72-7bd314ba883c@kernel.org> References: <20240803125510.4699-2-ziyao@disroot.org> <6320e4f3-e737-4787-8a72-7bd314ba883c@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240814_082149_233924_37E839C0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 13. August 2024, 18:38:58 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 04/08/2024 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 04/08/2024 15:20, Yao Zi wrote: > >>> > >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >>>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > >>>> + clock-output-names = "xin24m"; > >>>> + }; > >>>> + > >>>> + gic: interrupt-controller@fed01000 { > >>> > >>> Why this all is outside of SoC? > >> > >> Just as Heiko says, device tree for all other Rockchip SoCs don't have > >> a "soc" node. I didn't know why before but just follow the style. > >> > >> If you prefer add a soc node, I am willing to. > > > > Surprising as usually we expect MMIO nodes being part of SoC to be under > > soc@, but if that's Rockchip preference then fine. > > One more comment, I forgot we actually have it documented long time ago: > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L90 Thanks for finding that block. I guess we'll follow that advice then and go with a soc node :-) . Heiko