From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:43:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2456741.M6ZcdeZsEr@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130612110746.5D6943E0A56@localhost>
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 12:07:46 Grant Likely wrote:
>
> It actually seems a bit silly to put the internal regs into the ranges
> property at all. It's not like they need to be translated or provided to
> any child nodes. Just give the root node a reg property with the correct
> base for the internal regs.
I think you are missing some background about the internal-regs:
* These are SoC-wide registers including the UART and other things, not
just the mbus setup
* There are at least two different values used for the internal-regs
mapping address depending on the SoC and boot loader version
* We have to get the address from the DT since it is impossible to
probe or change without knowing the current setting: The internal-regs
also contains the registers in mbus used to relocate the internal-regs.
> As for regenerating the ranges; I have no problem with the kernel
> allocating ranges at runtime, but that code should not be creating a new
> ranges property and adding it to the tree. The knowledge should be kept
> internal to the driver and it should use an of_bus translator
> (drivers/of/address.c) to tap into the ranges parsings code.
Ok, makes sense. I didn't know about the of_bus code. Thanks for the
pointer!
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 16:47 [PATCH 00/14] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Use pr_fmt Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:15 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-08 17:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-08 18:38 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 1:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-09 14:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 13:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 22:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 23:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 7:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-11 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-11 23:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 21:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 22:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 22:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-15 16:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 11:07 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-06-12 11:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:52 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-09 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 14:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-09 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-12 10:48 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 13:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-11 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Update the mbus-compatible node's ranges property Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-12 10:25 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove device tree unused properties on A370 Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-08 14:18 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-07 16:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2456741.M6ZcdeZsEr@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox