linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] pwm: rockchip: Add APB and function both clocks support
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:09:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2474407.Xar3q3nCx6@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <caba81f3-d066-d64e-7e8e-6457b759e757@rock-chips.com>

Hi David,

Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017, 16:38:09 CEST schrieb David.Wu:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> ? 2017/7/12 1:03, Doug Anderson ??:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:03 PM, David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >> @@ -6,7 +6,13 @@ Required properties:
> >>      "rockchip,rk3288-pwm": found on RK3288 SoC
> >>      "rockchip,vop-pwm": found integrated in VOP on RK3288 SoC
> >>    
> >>    - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> >> 
> >> - - clocks: phandle and clock specifier of the PWM reference clock
> >> + - clocks: See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt
> >> +   - For older hardware (rk2928, rk3066, rk3188, rk3228, rk3288,
> >> rk3399):
> >> +     - There is one clock that's used both to derive the functional
> >> clock
> >> +       for the device and as the bus clock.
> >> +   - For newer hardware (rk3328 and future socs): specified by name
> >> +     - "pwm": This is used to derive the functional clock.
> >> +     - "pclk": This is the APB bus clock.
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure that that the above description doesn't quite match the
> > code.
> > 
> > * The above description says that for old hardware there is one clock
> > and 'clock-names' was not necessary (though as I understand it it's OK
> > if it's there).
> > 
> > * The old code matched the old description.  AKA: if there was no
> > "clock-names" then everything was OK.
> > 
> > * The new code will not work if there was no "clock-names".
> > 
> > Many of the old devices had a clock-names present (and it was "pwm"),
> > but not all.  Specifically it looks like
> > "arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3xxx.dtsi" doesn't specify a clock-names.
> 
> So we can keep code: the pc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> If the name is NULL, we can get the first clk defined at DTB.

I don't think it will work that way.

clk_get with NULL argument will likely grab the first clock of the list
independent of clock-names being present.

It might be better to do something like [pseudo-code]:

pwm->pclk = clk_get( ..., "pclk");
if (IS_ERR(pwm->pclk))
	pwm->pclk = NULL;

pwm->pwm_clk = clk_get(..., "pwm");
if (IS_ERR(pwm->pwm_clk))
	pwm->pwm_clk = clk_get(..., NULL);
if (IS_ERR(pwm->pwm_clk))
	return PTR_ERR(pwm->pwm_clk);

That way, you make your way backwards through the pwm-binding-history.
Ending at the single-clock without clock-names property as the last fallback.


Heiko

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-12 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-08  4:03 [PATCH v2 0/7] Add rk3328 pwm support David Wu
2017-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] pwm: rockchip: Add APB and function both clocks support David Wu
2017-07-11 17:03   ` Doug Anderson
2017-07-12  8:38     ` David.Wu
2017-07-12 19:09       ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2017-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: rockchip: Remove the judge from return value of pwm_config David Wu
2017-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] pwm: rockchip: Remove the dumplicate rockchip_pwm_ops ops David Wu
2017-08-02  8:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2017-08-02 11:31     ` David.Wu
2017-08-02 11:40       ` Boris Brezillon
2017-08-04  2:38         ` David.Wu
2017-08-04  7:09           ` Boris Brezillon
2017-08-08 15:41             ` David.Wu
2017-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] pwm: rockchip: Use pwm_apply instead of the pwm_enable David Wu
2017-07-08  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] pwm: rockchip: Move the configuration of polarity from rockchip_pwm_set_enable() to rockchip_pwm_config() David Wu
2017-07-08  4:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] pwm: rockchip: Add rk3328 pwm support David Wu
2017-07-08  4:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for rk3328 David Wu
2017-07-08  4:25 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 6/7] pwm: rockchip: Add rk3328 pwm support David Wu
2017-08-02  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " David.Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2474407.Xar3q3nCx6@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).