From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:06:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 In-Reply-To: <20141128113111.GO4508@piout.net> References: <2770184.6f6RpLLlMS@wuerfel> <20141128113111.GO4508@piout.net> Message-ID: <25050514.vKmbVUQfkQ@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 28 November 2014 12:31:12 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > > > > Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the > > > > series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch > > > > below. > > > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/246679.html > > > > I see. Yes, the approach is similar, and there are actually multiple > > independent problems: > > > > - getting the current driver to build with multiplatform (trivial, 5 lines) > > - changing the gpio handling to work with DT (simple, both of us did that) > > - writing the binding (simple) > > Yeah, let's focus on those first steps. Takashi was willing to take > patches, even if we were not converting the driver to ASoC. > > > - changing the driver to ASoC (not that simple) > > > > > Well, I tried to get a ac97c driver based on alsa soc framework as suggested > > > by Takashi. But I failed so far, I could not get my head around those > > > architecture. > > > > Let's just start with the trivial first patch, that can probably just be merged > > into 3.19, and then we can build on top of that later if anybody wants to > > get ac97 working again on at91. > > > > Do you want one of us to send that patch to Takashi and the Alsa ML or > will you do it? > You can add my ack. Please send it after you have checked that it actually works, I only took a snippet from my earlier patch assuming it would be sufficient, but I didn't try. Arnd