linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: b.zolnierkie@samsung.com (Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq-dt: add turbo modes support
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:58:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2522396.6jWphaZxGp@amdc1976> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727113340.GA10181@linux>

On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:03:40 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-07-15, 13:01, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> First of all, please don't be angry :).. We can discuss and get things
> sorted out ...

OK :)

> > This change was in the original patch posted in April:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/10/646
> 
> Yeah, and I already apologized for missing the request :)
> 
> > your review from a month ago didn't contain this request:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/667
> 
> Your patch inserted almost 116 lines and most of the stuff was around
> adding new bindings to get things working with cpufreq-dt driver.
> 
> And so I replied to the most important stuff, i.e. don't add new
> bindings, we will sort it out with opp-v2.
> 
> And frankly that wasn't the time where we could have discussed how
> exactly we are going to use it. Ofcourse we should get it via DT,
> platform data is just not required.
> 
> So, me not NAK ing this approach was fine as it wasn't about keeping
> this data in the platform data part.
> 
> > and now (after nearly 4 months) you are telling me that
> 
> I will say a month, as we discarded most of that patch recently :)
> 
> > I should change this because you are planning to do some
> > more changes in the future.
> 
> Its not about me doing some changes. But the whole point of doing the
> opp-v2 thing was to get rid of such platform data things..
> 
> Just that your work is competing with opp-v2 code :)
> 
> > Could we please keep it as it is for now and change it
> > later (after independent_clocks configuration will get
> > ported to use device tree)?
> 
> I thought we can get your work to a better shape, with all credit to
> you. But if you have some dependency on this for 4.3, then I don't
> mind killing this structure after you have polluted it a bit more :)

Thank you.  This is exactly the case here (I would like to get
Exynos4x12 conversion to use cpufreq-dt + exynos-cpufreq removal
in v4.3 if possible and adding new DT bindings will most likely
slow down the process considerably).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-09 15:43 [PATCH v2 0/7] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] opp: add dev_pm_opp_get_turbo_mode_setting() helper Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  2:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-27  8:33   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: opp: fix handling of turbo modes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  2:20   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-27  8:35   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 10:24     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-27 10:35       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 11:14         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-27 11:36           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 11:47             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-30 14:37               ` Kukjin Kim
2015-07-31 18:58                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-04  1:31                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq-dt: add turbo modes support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  8:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-27  8:37   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 11:01     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-27 11:33       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 11:58         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2015-07-27 12:01           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  8:30   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 16:12     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-11  6:36       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-15  9:58   ` Sylwester nawrocki
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: dts: Exynos4x12: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  8:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4x12 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  8:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-10  8:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2522396.6jWphaZxGp@amdc1976 \
    --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).