[PATCH net v2 0/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix some memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit

[PATCH net v2 0/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix some memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit

[Jinjie Ruan]

There are some memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit, this patchset
fixes them.

Changes in v2:
- Adhere to the 80 character limit in vcap_free_caf()
- Fix kernel test robot reported warnings in test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()

Jinjie Ruan (5):
  net: microchip: sparx5: Fix memory leak for
    vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test()
  net: microchip: sparx5: Fix memory leak for
    vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test()
  net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leak in
    vcap_api_encode_rule_test()
  net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in
    test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()
  net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit

 .../ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c  | 59 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH net v2 1/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix memory leak for vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test()

[Jinjie Ruan]

Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the field which
is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_rule_add_key() of
vcap_rule_add_key_bit/u32/u128() is not freed, and it cause
the memory leaks below.

unreferenced object 0xffff0276c14b7240 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 284, jiffies 4294894220 (age 920.072s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff 28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff  (<a.....(<a.....
    67 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 37 2b af ab ff ff  g.........7+....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000059ad6bcd>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000ff8002d3>] vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test+0x100/0xba8
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c14b7280 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 284, jiffies 4294894221 (age 920.068s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff 28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff  (<a.....(<a.....
    67 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 37 2b af ab ff ff  g.........7+....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000059ad6bcd>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000f5ac9dc7>] vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test+0x168/0xba8
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c14b72c0 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 284, jiffies 4294894221 (age 920.068s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff 28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff  (<a.....(<a.....
    67 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 37 2b af ab ff ff  g.........7+....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000059ad6bcd>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000c918ae7f>] vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test+0x1d0/0xba8
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c14b7300 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 284, jiffies 4294894221 (age 920.084s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff 28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff  (<a.....(<a.....
    7d 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 32 54 76 98 ab ff 00 ff  }.......2Tv.....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000059ad6bcd>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<0000000003352814>] vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test+0x240/0xba8
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c14b7340 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 284, jiffies 4294894221 (age 920.084s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff 28 3c 61 82 00 80 ff ff  (<a.....(<a.....
    51 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 17 26 35 44 63 62 71 00  Q........&5Dcbq.
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000059ad6bcd>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<000000001516f109>] vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test+0x2cc/0xba8
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: c956b9b318d9 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c  | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index c07f25e791c7..2fb0b8cf2b0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -995,6 +995,16 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_actionset_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (u32)0x00000000, actwords[11]);
 }
 
+static void vcap_free_ckf(struct vcap_rule *rule)
+{
+	struct vcap_client_keyfield *ckf, *next_ckf;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(ckf, next_ckf, &rule->keyfields, ctrl.list) {
+		list_del(&ckf->ctrl.list);
+		kfree(ckf);
+	}
+}
+
 static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct vcap_admin admin = {
@@ -1027,6 +1037,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.value);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.mask);
+	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, VCAP_BIT_1);
@@ -1039,6 +1050,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.value);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.mask);
+	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS,
@@ -1052,6 +1064,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.value);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.mask);
+	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u32(rule, VCAP_KF_TYPE, 0x98765432, 0xff00ffab);
@@ -1064,6 +1077,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, kf->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x98765432, kf->data.u32.value);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xff00ffab, kf->data.u32.mask);
+	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u128(rule, VCAP_KF_L3_IP6_SIP, &dip);
@@ -1078,6 +1092,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dip.value[idx], kf->data.u128.value[idx]);
 	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(dip.mask); ++idx)
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dip.mask[idx], kf->data.u128.mask[idx]);
+	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH net v2 2/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix memory leak for vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test()

[Jinjie Ruan]

Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the field which
is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_rule_add_action() of
vcap_rule_add_action_bit/u32() is not freed, and it cause
the memory leaks below.

unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b300 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff  h<b.....h<b.....
    3c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  <...............
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<00000000ae66c16c>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0xa4/0x990
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b2c0 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff  h<b.....h<b.....
    3c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  <...............
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<00000000607782aa>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x100/0x990
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b280 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.072s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff  h<b.....h<b.....
    3c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  <...............
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000004e640602>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x15c/0x990
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b240 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.092s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff  h<b.....h<b.....
    5a 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 32 54 76 98 00 00 00 00  Z.......2Tv.....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<0000000011141bf8>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x1bc/0x990
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0276c496b200 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 286, jiffies 4294894224 (age 920.092s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff 68 3c 62 82 00 80 ff ff  h<b.....h<b.....
    28 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 dd cc bb aa 00 00 00 00  (...............
  backtrace:
    [<0000000028f08898>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000514b9b37>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<000000004620684a>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008b41c84d>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<00000000d5ed3088>] vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test+0x22c/0x990
    [<00000000fcc5326c>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000f5f45b20>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000026284079>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000024d4a996>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: c956b9b318d9 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- Fix it to adhere to 80 character limit.
---
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index 2fb0b8cf2b0c..f268383a7570 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -1095,6 +1095,17 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	vcap_free_ckf(rule);
 }
 
+static void vcap_free_caf(struct vcap_rule *rule)
+{
+	struct vcap_client_actionfield *caf, *next_caf;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(caf, next_caf,
+				 &rule->actionfields, ctrl.list) {
+		list_del(&caf->ctrl.list);
+		kfree(caf);
+	}
+}
+
 static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct vcap_admin admin = {
@@ -1120,6 +1131,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value);
+	vcap_free_caf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
@@ -1131,6 +1143,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, af->data.u1.value);
+	vcap_free_caf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_ANY);
@@ -1142,6 +1155,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value);
+	vcap_free_caf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_TYPE, 0x98765432);
@@ -1153,6 +1167,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_TYPE, af->ctrl.action);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x98765432, af->data.u32.value);
+	vcap_free_caf(rule);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
 	ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, 0xaabbccdd);
@@ -1164,6 +1179,7 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, af->ctrl.action);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xaabbccdd, af->data.u32.value);
+	vcap_free_caf(rule);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_rule_find_keyset_basic_test(struct kunit *test)
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH net v2 3/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leak in vcap_api_encode_rule_test()

[Jinjie Ruan]

Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
is allocated in vcap_dup_rule() and the export which is allocated in
vcap_enable() of vcap_enable_lookups in vcap_api_encode_rule_test()
is not freed, and it cause the memory leaks below.

Use vcap_enable_lookups() with false arg to free the export as
other drivers do it. And use vcap_del_rule() to free the duprule.

unreferenced object 0xffff677a0278bb00 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 388, jiffies 4294895987 (age 1101.840s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    18 bd a5 82 00 80 ff ff 18 bd a5 82 00 80 ff ff  ................
    40 fe c8 0e be c6 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  @...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000007d53023a>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<0000000076e3f654>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000034d76721>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000013380a5>] vcap_enable_lookups+0x1c8/0x70c
    [<00000000bbec496b>] vcap_api_encode_rule_test+0x2f8/0xb18
    [<000000002c2bfb7b>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000ff74642b>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<000000004af845ca>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000038a000ca>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff677a027803c0 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 388, jiffies 4294895988 (age 1101.836s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 12 7a 00 05 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 64 00 00 00  ..z.........d...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d8 03 78 02 7a 67 ff ff  ..........x.zg..
  backtrace:
    [<000000007d53023a>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<0000000076e3f654>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000034d76721>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000c1010131>] vcap_dup_rule+0x34/0x14c
    [<00000000d43c54a4>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000073f1c26d>] vcap_api_encode_rule_test+0x304/0xb18
    [<000000002c2bfb7b>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000ff74642b>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<000000004af845ca>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<0000000038a000ca>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: c956b9b318d9 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index f268383a7570..8c61a5dbce55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -1439,6 +1439,10 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
 	ret = list_empty(&is2_admin.rules);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	vcap_enable_lookups(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 0, 0,
+			    rule->cookie, false);
+
 	vcap_free_rule(rule);
 
 	/* Check that the rule has been freed: tricky to access since this
@@ -1449,6 +1453,8 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
 	ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, id);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_set_rule_counter_test(struct kunit *test)
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH net v2 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()

[Jinjie Ruan]

Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_dup_rule(), the field which is
allocated by kzalloc in vcap_rule_add_action() and
vcap_rule_add_key() is not freed, and it cause the memory leaks
below. Use vcap_free_rule() to free them as other drivers do it.

And since the return rule of test_vcap_xn_rule_creator() is not
used, remove it and switch to void.

unreferenced object 0xffff058383334240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 309, jiffies 4294894222 (age 639.800s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 90 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 81 93 84 83 05 ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000648fefae>] vcap_alloc_rule+0x17c/0x26c
    [<000000004da16164>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xac/0x328
    [<00000000231b1097>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xcc/0x184
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0583849380c0 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 309, jiffies 4294894222 (age 639.800s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    40 81 93 84 83 05 ff ff 68 42 33 83 83 05 ff ff  @.......hB3.....
    22 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  "...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000ee41df9e>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000001cc1bb38>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xd8/0x328
    [<00000000231b1097>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xcc/0x184
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff058384938100 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 309, jiffies 4294894222 (age 639.800s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    80 81 93 84 83 05 ff ff 58 42 33 83 83 05 ff ff  ........XB3.....
    7d 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00  }...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000043c78991>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000ba73cfbe>] vcap_add_type_keyfield+0xfc/0x128
    [<000000002b00f7df>] vcap_val_rule+0x274/0x3e8
    [<00000000e67d2ff5>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xf0/0x328
    [<00000000231b1097>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xcc/0x184
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

unreferenced object 0xffff0583833b6240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 311, jiffies 4294894225 (age 639.844s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 2c 01 00 00  .'..........,...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 91 8f 84 83 05 ff ff  ........@.......
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000648fefae>] vcap_alloc_rule+0x17c/0x26c
    [<000000004da16164>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xac/0x328
    [<00000000509de3f4>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x10c/0x654
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0583848f9100 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 311, jiffies 4294894225 (age 639.844s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    80 91 8f 84 83 05 ff ff 68 62 3b 83 83 05 ff ff  ........hb;.....
    22 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a5 b4 ff ff  "...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000ee41df9e>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000001cc1bb38>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xd8/0x328
    [<00000000509de3f4>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x10c/0x654
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0583848f9140 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 311, jiffies 4294894225 (age 639.844s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    c0 91 8f 84 83 05 ff ff 58 62 3b 83 83 05 ff ff  ........Xb;.....
    7d 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00  }...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000043c78991>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000ba73cfbe>] vcap_add_type_keyfield+0xfc/0x128
    [<000000002b00f7df>] vcap_val_rule+0x274/0x3e8
    [<00000000e67d2ff5>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xf0/0x328
    [<00000000509de3f4>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x10c/0x654
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

unreferenced object 0xffff05838264e0c0 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 313, jiffies 4294894230 (age 639.864s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 f4 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 3a 97 84 83 05 ff ff  ........@:......
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000648fefae>] vcap_alloc_rule+0x17c/0x26c
    [<000000004da16164>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xac/0x328
    [<00000000a29794d8>] vcap_api_rule_remove_at_end_test+0xbc/0xb48
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff058384973a80 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 313, jiffies 4294894230 (age 639.864s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    e8 e0 64 82 83 05 ff ff e8 e0 64 82 83 05 ff ff  ..d.......d.....
    22 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff ff  "...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000ee41df9e>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000001cc1bb38>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xd8/0x328
    [<00000000a29794d8>] vcap_api_rule_remove_at_end_test+0xbc/0xb48
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff058384973a40 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 313, jiffies 4294894230 (age 639.880s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    80 39 97 84 83 05 ff ff d8 e0 64 82 83 05 ff ff  .9........d.....
    7d 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00  }...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000043c78991>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<0000000094335477>] vcap_add_type_keyfield+0xbc/0x128
    [<000000002b00f7df>] vcap_val_rule+0x274/0x3e8
    [<00000000e67d2ff5>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xf0/0x328
    [<00000000a29794d8>] vcap_api_rule_remove_at_end_test+0xbc/0xb48
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

unreferenced object 0xffff0583832fa240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 315, jiffies 4294894233 (age 639.920s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 90 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a1 8b 84 83 05 ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000648fefae>] vcap_alloc_rule+0x17c/0x26c
    [<000000004da16164>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xac/0x328
    [<00000000be638a45>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_middle_test+0xc4/0xb80
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0583848ba0c0 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 315, jiffies 4294894233 (age 639.920s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    40 a1 8b 84 83 05 ff ff 68 a2 2f 83 83 05 ff ff  @.......h./.....
    22 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff ff  "...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000ee41df9e>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000001cc1bb38>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xd8/0x328
    [<00000000be638a45>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_middle_test+0xc4/0xb80
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff0583848ba100 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 315, jiffies 4294894233 (age 639.920s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    80 a1 8b 84 83 05 ff ff 58 a2 2f 83 83 05 ff ff  ........X./.....
    7d 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00  }...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000043c78991>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<00000000ba73cfbe>] vcap_add_type_keyfield+0xfc/0x128
    [<000000002b00f7df>] vcap_val_rule+0x274/0x3e8
    [<00000000e67d2ff5>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xf0/0x328
    [<00000000be638a45>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_middle_test+0xc4/0xb80
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

unreferenced object 0xffff0583827d2180 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 317, jiffies 4294894238 (age 639.956s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 90 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e1 06 83 83 05 ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000648fefae>] vcap_alloc_rule+0x17c/0x26c
    [<000000004da16164>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xac/0x328
    [<00000000e1ed8350>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test+0x144/0x6c0
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff05838306e0c0 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 317, jiffies 4294894238 (age 639.956s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    40 e1 06 83 83 05 ff ff a8 21 7d 82 83 05 ff ff  @........!}.....
    22 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff ff  "...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<00000000ee41df9e>] vcap_rule_add_action+0x104/0x178
    [<000000001cc1bb38>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xd8/0x328
    [<00000000e1ed8350>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test+0x144/0x6c0
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff05838306e180 (size 64):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 317, jiffies 4294894238 (age 639.968s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    98 21 7d 82 83 05 ff ff 00 e1 06 83 83 05 ff ff  .!}.............
    67 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00 ff 00 00 00  g...............
  backtrace:
    [<000000008585a8f7>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000795eba12>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000061886991>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<0000000043c78991>] vcap_rule_add_key+0x104/0x180
    [<000000006ce4945d>] test_add_def_fields+0x84/0x8c
    [<00000000507e0ab6>] vcap_val_rule+0x294/0x3e8
    [<00000000e67d2ff5>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0xf0/0x328
    [<00000000e1ed8350>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test+0x144/0x6c0
    [<00000000548b559e>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000663f0105>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<00000000e646f120>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<000000005257599e>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: dccc30cc4906 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add KUNIT test of counters and sorted rules")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309090950.uOTEKQq3-lkp@intel.com/
---
v2:
- Add static to fix the kernel test robot reported build warnings.
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index 8c61a5dbce55..99f04a53a442 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -243,10 +243,9 @@ static void vcap_test_api_init(struct vcap_admin *admin)
 }
 
 /* Helper function to create a rule of a specific size */
-static struct vcap_rule *
-test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(struct kunit *test, int cid, enum vcap_user user,
-			  u16 priority,
-			  int id, int size, int expected_addr)
+static void test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(struct kunit *test, int cid,
+				      enum vcap_user user, u16 priority,
+				      int id, int size, int expected_addr)
 {
 	struct vcap_rule *rule;
 	struct vcap_rule_internal *ri;
@@ -311,7 +310,7 @@ test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(struct kunit *test, int cid, enum vcap_user user,
 	ret = vcap_add_rule(rule);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected_addr, ri->addr);
-	return rule;
+	vcap_free_rule(rule);
 }
 
 /* Prepare testing rule deletion */
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH net v2 5/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in vcap_api_kunit

[Jinjie Ruan]

Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_dup_rule() of
test_vcap_xn_rule_creator() is not freed, and it cause the memory leaks
below. Use vcap_del_rule() to free them as other functions do it.

unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4846f6180 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 405, jiffies 4294895522 (age 880.004s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 f4 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 98 61 6f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........ao..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000d2ac4ccb>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xa4/0x114
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4846f6240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 405, jiffies 4294895524 (age 879.996s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 90 01 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 58 62 6f 84 b4 6e ff ff  ........Xbo..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<0000000052e6ad35>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xbc/0x114
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4846f6300 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 405, jiffies 4294895524 (age 879.996s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 2c 01 00 00  .'..........,...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 63 6f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........co..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<000000001b0895d4>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xd4/0x114
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4846f63c0 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 405, jiffies 4294895524 (age 880.012s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 c8 00 00 00  .'......(.......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d8 63 6f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........co..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000134c151f>] vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test+0xec/0x114
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4845fc180 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 407, jiffies 4294895527 (age 880.000s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 c8 00 00 00  .'..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 98 c1 5f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........._..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000fa5f64d3>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0xc8/0x600
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4845fc240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 407, jiffies 4294895527 (age 880.000s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 2c 01 00 00  .'..........,...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 58 c2 5f 84 b4 6e ff ff  ........X._..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000453dcd80>] vcap_add_rule+0x134/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000a7db42de>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x108/0x600
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4845fc300 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 407, jiffies 4294895527 (age 880.000s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 90 01 00 00  .'......(.......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 c3 5f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........._..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000453dcd80>] vcap_add_rule+0x134/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000ea416c94>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x150/0x600
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb4845fc3c0 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 407, jiffies 4294895527 (age 880.020s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 32 00 00 00 f4 01 00 00  .'......2.......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d8 c3 5f 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........._..n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000453dcd80>] vcap_add_rule+0x134/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<00000000764a39b4>] vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test+0x198/0x600
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb484cd4240 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 413, jiffies 4294895543 (age 879.956s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 2c 01 00 00  .'..........,...
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 58 42 cd 84 b4 6e ff ff  ........XB...n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<0000000023976dd4>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test+0x158/0x658
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff6eb484cd4300 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 413, jiffies 4294895543 (age 879.956s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    10 27 00 00 04 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 c8 00 00 00  .'......(.......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 43 cd 84 b4 6e ff ff  .........C...n..
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f1b5b86e>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
    [<00000000c56cdd9a>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
    [<0000000046ef1b64>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
    [<000000008565145b>] vcap_dup_rule+0x38/0x210
    [<00000000bd9e1f12>] vcap_add_rule+0x29c/0x32c
    [<0000000070a539b1>] test_vcap_xn_rule_creator.constprop.43+0x120/0x330
    [<000000000b4760ff>] vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test+0x170/0x658
    [<000000000f88f9cb>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
    [<00000000e848de5a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
    [<0000000058a88b6b>] kthread+0x124/0x130
    [<00000000891cf28a>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: dccc30cc4906 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add KUNIT test of counters and sorted rules")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c    | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index 99f04a53a442..fe4e166de8a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -1597,6 +1597,11 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_insert_in_order_test(struct kunit *test)
 	test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(test, 10000, VCAP_USER_QOS, 20, 400, 6, 774);
 	test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(test, 10000, VCAP_USER_QOS, 30, 300, 3, 771);
 	test_vcap_xn_rule_creator(test, 10000, VCAP_USER_QOS, 40, 200, 2, 768);
+
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 200);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 300);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 400);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 500);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test(struct kunit *test)
@@ -1655,6 +1660,11 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_insert_reverse_order_test(struct kunit *test)
 		++idx;
 	}
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 768, admin.last_used_addr);
+
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 500);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 400);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 300);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 200);
 }
 
 static void vcap_api_rule_remove_at_end_test(struct kunit *test)
@@ -1855,6 +1865,9 @@ static void vcap_api_rule_remove_in_front_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 786, test_init_start);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 8, test_init_count);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 794, admin.last_used_addr);
+
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 200);
+	vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, 300);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case vcap_api_rule_remove_test_cases[] = {
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH net v2 3/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leak in vcap_api_encode_rule_test()

[Paolo Abeni]

On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 16:02 +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
> is allocated in vcap_dup_rule() and the export which is allocated in

Small typo above: 'export' should be 'eport' or 'vcap enabled port'. 
Please fix that, as it makes the changelog a bit confusing.

Thanks!

Paolo


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()

[Paolo Abeni]

On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 16:02 +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
> is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_dup_rule(), 

Small typo above, I think it should be 'vcap_alloc_rule' instead of
'vcap_dup_rule'. I think it's relevant, otherwise looking only at the
changelog, the next patch would be a not-needed/duplicated of this one.

Please fix the above, thanks!

Paolo


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH net v2 3/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leak in vcap_api_encode_rule_test()

[Ruan Jinjie]

On 2023/9/12 15:38, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 16:02 +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
>> is allocated in vcap_dup_rule() and the export which is allocated in
> 
> Small typo above: 'export' should be 'eport' or 'vcap enabled port'. 
> Please fix that, as it makes the changelog a bit confusing.

Thank you! I'll fix it sooner.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()

[Ruan Jinjie]

On 2023/9/12 15:41, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 16:02 +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
>> is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_dup_rule(), 
> 
> Small typo above, I think it should be 'vcap_alloc_rule' instead of
> 'vcap_dup_rule'. I think it's relevant, otherwise looking only at the
> changelog, the next patch would be a not-needed/duplicated of this one.
> 
> Please fix the above, thanks!

Thank you! I'll fix it sooner.

> 
> Paolo
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel