From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:10:38 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/7] ARM: common: vic: Parse interrupt and resume
 masks from device tree
In-Reply-To: <20130110110314.GH20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1357774909-29938-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
 <1357774909-29938-2-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
 <20130110110314.GH20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Message-ID: <25622346.hsAr9IOJWj@flatron>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 10 of January 2013 11:03:14 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:41:43AM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > +- interrupt-mask : Bit mask of valid interrupt sources (defaults to
> > all valid) +- wakeup-mask : Bit mask of interrupt sources that can
> > wake up the system +  (defaults to all allowed)
> 
> Should this really be configured in the VIC itself?  It seems like
> something that might change at runtime (for example, due to the user
> configuring wakes in sysfs).

This is not the runtime interrupt/wakeup mask, but a global mask of 
available interrupt/wakeup lines on particular platform, which still have 
to be configured and enabled appropriately by user.

Best regards,
Tomasz Figa