From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:40:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] arm64: dts: Add the arasan sdhc nodes in
 apm-storm.dtsi.
In-Reply-To: <5549C68B.9090602@xilinx.com>
References: <1430817426-5241-1-git-send-email-stripathi@apm.com>
 <4635229.bceBxngCoe@wuerfel> <5549C68B.9090602@xilinx.com>
Message-ID: <2568634.iEosTvMJpM@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 06 May 2015 09:45:15 Michal Simek wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 09:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 May 2015 10:41:07 Suman Tripathi wrote:
> >>>> @@ -533,6 +567,16 @@
> >>>>                         interrupts = <0x0 0x4f 0x4>;
> >>>>                 };
> >>>>
> >>>> +               sdhc0: sdhc at 1c000000 {
> >>>> +                       device_type = "sdhc";
> >>>
> >>> device_type generally should not be used (there are a few exceptions).
> >>
> >> Okay !!
> >>
> > 
> > While we're at it, please change sdhc at 1c000000 to mmc at 1c000000.
> > Even though Linux does not care, we try to use the standard device
> > names for consistency.
> 
> Do we have a list of these names somewhere?
> Normally I do use ePARP - generic names recommendation but mmc or sdhci
> are not listed there.
> Both combination mmc@ or sdhci@ are used in the kernel.
> 
> On zynq and zynqmp we do use shdci at .
> 

Ah, I thought ePAPR listed mmc already. Using "sdhci" is a little too
specific here, since a lot of mmc hosts are not sdhci compliant, and
"sdhc" is completely wrong, because that identifies a specific card
type, but a host that supports SDHC cards will generally also work
with SD (less than 4GB) or SDXC (more than 48GB) cards.

	Arnd