From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: rockchip: rk3188: enable pull-ups on UART inputs
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:20:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2573614.4MaI90U1A8@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2567235.KcPFJfGIvp@typ>
Hi Max,
Am Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014, 20:25:43 schrieb Max Schwarz:
> Hello Heiko,
>
> > So I agree with you but would like to determine if we should also set the
> > txd to pull down in one go, to restore the default pull setting of these
> > pins or should leave them as is.
> > Thoughts?
>
> As soon as the UART is enabled, that TX pull-down does not do anything
> because the UART will actively drive the pin. I don't know what happens if
> the UART is suspended through runtime PM, though. I skimmed over the
> 8250_dw and saw support for that.
>
> On the radxa board, there is even an external pull-up on the TX pin. The
> UART idle level is high, so that makes sense. If we wanted to pull the pin
> somewhere, I guess it should be up, not down.
>
> My vote would be to keep the patch as it is. In any case, it's an
> improvement of the status quo and does not change TX behavior.
ok, but as we change the default behaviour of the pin - and as we discussed
above rightfully so, the commit message should reflect this and not describe a
Radxa-Rock specific change. So would you be ok with something like:
---------- 8< --------------------
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: rockchip: rk3188: enable pull-ups on UART RX pins
The default behaviour of the uart-rx pins on the rk3188 is to be pulled up and
a lot of designs use diodes to even prevent them from being raised from the
outside.
Therefore change the rx-pin settings accordingly.
This also fixes a uart receive problem on mass production Radxa Rock boards.
---------- 8< --------------------
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-22 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-09 19:43 [PATCH] ARM: rockchip: rk3188: enable pull-ups on UART inputs Max Schwarz
2014-03-13 0:36 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-03-13 19:25 ` Max Schwarz
2014-03-22 22:20 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-03-22 23:03 ` Max Schwarz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2573614.4MaI90U1A8@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).