From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:05:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc In-Reply-To: <1370870659-10929-7-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com> References: <1370870659-10929-1-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com> <1370870659-10929-7-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com> Message-ID: <2603217.1gvhPdgQES@flatron> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 10 of June 2013 18:54:18 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > From: Vikas Sajjan > > While trying to get rate of "mout_vpllsrc" MUX (parent) for registering > the "fout_vpll" (child), we found get rate was failing. > > So this patch moves the mout_vpllsrc MUX out of the existing common list > and registers the mout_vpllsrc MUX before the PLL registrations. > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan > Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c index 21f5491..6881810 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > @@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock > exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks[] __initdata = { FFACTOR(none, > "fout_bplldiv2", "fout_bpll", 1, 2, 0), > }; > > +struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks[] __initdata = { > + MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1), > +}; > + > struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > MUX(none, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1), > MUX(none, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), > @@ -235,7 +239,6 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] > __initdata = { MUX(none, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1), > MUX(none, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1), > MUX(none, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1), > - MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1), > MUX(none, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1), > MUX(none, "sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1), > MUX(none, "sclk_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1), > @@ -526,6 +529,8 @@ void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node > *np) samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks), > ext_clk_match); > + samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks, > + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks)); > samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls), > reg_base); > samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks, Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa Best regards, Tomasz