From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 23:01:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2606282.lG9qK7uBW0@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160510183934.GJ1256@tuxbot>
On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 09 May 18:29 PDT 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > net/qrtr/smd.c:106:14: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > .callback = qcom_smd_qrtr_callback,
> > ^
> > net/qrtr/smd.c:106:14: note: (near initialization for 'qcom_smd_qrtr_driver.callback')
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > bdabad3e363d ("net: Add Qualcomm IPC router")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > b853cb9628bf ("soc: qcom: smd: Make callback pass channel reference")
> >
> > from the arm-soc tree.
> >
> > I added the following merge fix patch (and it turned out I needed the
> > new stubs).
> >
>
> Sorry for not spotting this issue earlier, I missed Andy's second pull
> request towards arm-soc and thought the SMD changes missed this cycle.
>
>
> Your patch looks good, but I'm not sure how we should approach the merge
> window; Andy can't pick the patch because he doesn't have the qrtr code
> and David doesn't have the SMD patches coming through Andy.
>
> FWIW, Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>
>
> I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
> David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late
> in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I
> can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)?
I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that
we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send
a pull request with the merge to davem.
Alternatively, in case Linus merges net-next before we get that fix
in, I could send Stephen's fix to Linus along with the pull requests.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 1:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-10 1:52 ` Andy Gross
2016-05-10 18:39 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-13 21:01 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-05-13 22:19 ` QRTR merge conflict resolution (was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree) Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-13 22:47 ` Andy Gross
2016-05-14 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-17 18:11 ` QRTR merge conflict resolution David Miller
2016-05-18 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-18 4:09 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2606282.lG9qK7uBW0@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox