From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660E5C61DB2 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=joBlEjrgr9muiP0UDjGGGTEJ6Vs1HF+Fy4q2Nr/4iJc=; b=EnujvbYMvrxjKgljDrY9678QQk MyT2PV+bg1zKWHB/9dCHRFLyxSzBHOCN9iK4EikuaVf/L34eg9P7aas3hVXx4xPv9FUqaAmJMefUW rH9pdk05H7iDnkqRxZciDMLxB6gOssyF1AfucIyNF/EZUa5PGSZiNuNnKFj727b2hv2hXlL8RJJmJ FKrR70zwwyN0ib08mpknebYF0MHvIX/bb9ex6jE3RzI/lrGt96XCNl/kKLPeBTQ19tiNFIlxm3TYx a++KwzzS9WuH76oma6zOVhWszc0Y2igzNBrtm/hW9oEBziioT+k2wpxsLfY4Ay3XvL1KzQzkc6DZ7 fbO+TIKQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uOYeR-00000003kVT-1Ywv; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:18:43 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uOYSQ-00000003jKq-3Hnh; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:06:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=joBlEjrgr9muiP0UDjGGGTEJ6Vs1HF+Fy4q2Nr/4iJc=; b=d2TvmF6njbZP0r8VPzRz1pdgRw D0cGitUZxFqVoVAdpgEyLxt/bO6IhuzyPF1TWutbiciAOvR1zlTJB5b59Df0npsAiZseMTfbPsG5j f3hBHLG5LFVosHfH9fARI9OzCu93O3Wb7VnQow+eoxZa7MFsP3qwy+FQnzg5NI2faW/ibEjapB3ro 6qJsxwqPcvAdy6AKnabOX1lRjHyO8/x+gUoWzT+vp3vz7COQwC2tRYN/dCQTxxwWpORh3+JVWfkls K5V0iUGo1JOOPeX3rP9NnQTrEJ7Lmw9cqSQZ0VCKrsprZzag7Rd+nGhz1GqPwYDZXFTvWrzZkWnqg ZbQJZ44A==; Received: from i53875b1c.versanet.de ([83.135.91.28] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uOYSI-0005iM-T1; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:06:10 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: i@chainsx.cn, Hsun Lai Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, inindev@gmail.com, jonas@kwiboo.se, krzk+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, robh@kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au Subject: Re: [v5,0/2] Add support for Firefly Station-M3/ROC-RK3588S-PC Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:06:10 +0200 Message-ID: <2607600.Icojqenx9y@phil> In-Reply-To: <20250602153500.1831349-1-i@chainsx.cn> References: <20250530031046.166202-1-i@chainsx.cn> <20250602153500.1831349-1-i@chainsx.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250609_020618_817688_74F0C289 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Montag, 2. Juni 2025, 17:35:00 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schrieb= Hsun Lai: > > I tried to replicate on top of master=20 > > (24de2b9da3e28df323c1e096538ae1e035751adf) but couldn't, so I guess we= =20 > > can simply ignore this warning? >=20 > Yes, the same situation occurs here, > and it has already been answered by Heiko St=C3=BCbner(#2): > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/cover/20250516012402.= 580468-1-i@chainsx.cn/ Now with 6.16-rc1 out, this should disappear. But I'd assume that bot check might have moved the binding out of the review queue of the dt-maintainers, so I guess you might try resending the series on top of that, because we're missing an Review/Ack on the binding. Heiko