From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DFBC021B8 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 22:19:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JofA2Qh9JGaxtMid0/5sEvR2yQLob0lQuZxap80vKqw=; b=K1KlfPfcaC9KSJPEFIL+xySfHn hhvOKYednlqXyRw5Ofzipq5ilTyTFw1rRjVQT6Oz4e4jlbb5IhztpM0zsJS1Y7KnEppLBN/Wm7cHZ sNz7xEOA6sicZdqv2mBNzFoJp0XJbHMrNSM+yDecDtlXlTlIEjGpT2MOEj7WXMFftAKk/L7bN0799 8AUMKb75n59UijmqT5nkaRWKK+RgytuEl56EN9srkaHU13hc5cYda971Mbqk+YHdSaCfu78ZAQRQl a2VOrXSqIFsiWzsb3oBfxHZUa53bByThMPxgP1qyokZ2FITMX0rvjEQwxJWJ2II7UQyLQw8GICXGp +oFvVXAw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpabD-00000006O8P-3bJW; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:18:51 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpaZd-00000006O3g-44dz; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:17:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JofA2Qh9JGaxtMid0/5sEvR2yQLob0lQuZxap80vKqw=; b=Tkh7mn3A+PYTIgV27zWhch/208 ETUALWlqEqZb9jksjEgNDlpzfKLYqN2rarathziQV8Ntjv+PPBBfpKKage0LcF7B5AYw5QcG4mzHk Nds+uv8i40buo1duskWACkkerB1c8+77MtGCmUqDCz/AWnTbCcf/VEohCydBFaftKyZDJ4/Buxmfy mPtQZSVrBco/oLg3OHlqc4Wn15Q5yI3xcUjWkH5zHT1Lf0r43ib9TeG6ezMFV4R1zoTZ6I17a2l91 INcWrZvknMxlFFMkx2w45YdSG5m6sc+nEHFuQA6yVC26YXkNz7i4f39l6AJ1KWr3USk5v0Ew3iEAH kPVZlMcw==; Received: from i53875a38.versanet.de ([83.135.90.56] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tpaBb-0006QR-08; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:52:23 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Dragan Simic Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, didi.debian@cknow.org, chris@z9.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Slightly improve hardware description of Pine64 RockPro64 Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:52:22 +0100 Message-ID: <2630232.Icojqenx9y@diego> In-Reply-To: <757afa87255212dfa5abf4c0e31deb08@manjaro.org> References: <174104113599.8946.16805724674396090918.b4-ty@sntech.de> <757afa87255212dfa5abf4c0e31deb08@manjaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250304_141714_001746_80693498 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 4. M=C3=A4rz 2025, 07:44:59 MEZ schrieb Dragan Simic: > Hello Heiko, >=20 > On 2025-03-03 23:36, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 19:48:02 +0100, Dragan Simic wrote: > >> This is a small series that introduces small improvements to the way > >> Pine64 RockPro64 [1] single-board-computer is described in the DT=20 > >> files. > >> This applies to both production-run revisions of the RockPro64. > >>=20 > >> The introduced improvements boil down to eliminating some warnings=20 > >> from > >> the kernel log, by adding a previously undefined regulator and by=20 > >> adding > >> some previously missing references to the regulators. > >>=20 > >> [...] > >=20 > > Applied, thanks! > >=20 > > [1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add avdd HDMI supplies to RockPro64 board=20 > > dtsi > > commit: bd1c959f37f384b477f51572331b0dc828bd009a > > [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64=20 > > board dtsi > > commit: 64ef4a4320e7aa3f0f267e01f170f52b90bf0b1b > >=20 > > I've moved the pcie12v supply up one line. > > While in a mathematical sense it's true 12 > 3.3, we're sorting > > alphabetical, so it's 1?? < 3?? . > >=20 > > And yes I sympathize with 3.3 < 12, but also have come to appreciate=20 > > not > > having overly many special cases :-) >=20 > Great, thanks! :) >=20 > I'm fine with the alphabetical ordering, albeit with some caveats > described below, but the following part of the patch description > should also be removed, if possible, so the patch description fully > matches the introduced changes: >=20 > Shuffle and reorder the "vpcie*-supply" properties a bit, so they're=20 > sorted > alphanumerically, which is a bit more logical and more useful than=20 > having > these properties listed in their strict alphabetical order. I've amended the commit, dropping this block > I'm hoping you'll agree that specifying alphanumerical ordering > for the properties in the DTS coding style is the way to go, just > like it's already specified for the ordering of the nodes. I'll > go ahead and submit an appropriate patch for the DT guidelines. vpcie0v9-supply =3D <&vcca_0v9>; vpcie1v8-supply =3D <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie3v3-supply =3D <&vcc3v3_pcie>; vpcie12v-supply =3D <&vcc12v_dcin>; In the end I don't care _that_ much, but personally I find that alphanumerical ordering harder to read ;-) . Because in the example above, my mind now constantly shouts "why is vpcie1... after vpcie3... ..... ooooh right, it's alpha-numerical" But I can live with it I guess ;-) . As 3.3 is smaller than 12 afterall. Heiko