mainline build: 137 builds: 0 failed, 137 passed, 296 warnings (v4.4-10454-g3e1e21c7bfcf)

[arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)]

On Monday 25 January 2016 10:18:56 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org> writes:
> 
> > On 22 January 2016 at 05:19, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> On Thursday 21 January 2016 22:14:26 kernelci. org bot wrote:
> >>> Warnings summary:
> >>>
> >>>     224  <stdin>:1307:2: warning: #warning syscall copy_file_range not implemented [-Wcpp]
> >>
> >> I don't think anyone has sent this so far, sending a patch now.
> >>
> >>>      29  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c:190:27: warning: 'vendor_zte' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> >>
> >> Patch sent a couple of days ago, got an Ack and waiting to be applied.
> >>
> >>>      12  net/bluetooth/mgmt.c:5493:8: warning: 'r192' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >>>      12  net/bluetooth/mgmt.c:5493:8: warning: 'h192' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >>
> >> This happens only in gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8
> >>
> >>>       5  crypto/wp512.c:987:1: warning: the frame size of 1168 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >>>       1  crypto/wp512.c:987:1: warning: the frame size of 1112 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >>
> >> and this one only in gcc-4.7
> >>
> >> Any chance we can update the toolchain on kernelci.org to 4.9 or higher?
> >> I'm normally testing with gcc-5.2, which has a little better warnings.
> >
> > I'm ok with upgrading to 4.9 or higher. Kevin any issues with this?
> 
> No objection in principle, but we probably can't do this across the
> board without fallout.
> 
> I suspect we'll have issues with older stable kernels that have never
> been compiled with > 4.7, but I haven't actually tried.
> 

My guess is that there is very little of that. We had one issues with
gcc-4.8 through 4.8.2 generating bad code, but aside of that I don't
remember a recent case where a newer compiler broke stuff.

There might be a couple of extra warnings in older kernels, but I've
tried to ensure that all new warnings that got introduced from more
recent gcc versions are fixed mainline kernels.

	Arnd