From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5BAC27C51 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:25:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=KxtLqCvPe4aiknClpGeue24G2LG3amMU4dfdJUuqv1U=; b=f0AqkBz0CjsrEN +2bVspUEVTIoo55xIbo/BTwNjS2a2VPTRqKGiTyqPf8T4HuwBYOm4m8WUkH63RfB0EbcCe8d9tXfg bajndMIQW/osb9M+Os3nIk2yA9WfNn39OkRwfa4//TCLscNT5U2zxxrgl+sZY7U57ODLHrZvp7NOQ ZqKx8AsS4k5qZUh0ik4Hyp4VyRwVmdc5Haf9z6iFJp6FivWgQWYiHqFWmpFz6YlXHE39ND8BDvyW3 putEylHewZCSgb30+WKRrGa7KfJjevvSvuD1RzQVLMPggCZDV5//r07MXgK0CpjN8onAZIxMr5yFC W4KgFeTyJNls2zf3XAXw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCM6e-00000004to0-2dSG; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:24:52 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCM6a-00000004tmL-0YZR; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:24:49 +0000 Received: from i53875a0e.versanet.de ([83.135.90.14] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sCM69-0005AH-Ga; Wed, 29 May 2024 18:24:21 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Andy Yan , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Diederik de Haas , tzimmermann@suse.de, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: mripard@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, hjc@rock-chips.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, Andy Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix the port mux of VP2 Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 18:24:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2652218.tIAgqjz4sF@diego> In-Reply-To: <2397969.FhQbyb98Gs@bagend> References: <20240422101905.32703-1-andyshrk@163.com> <171405838036.2897712.4067984796758491640.b4-ty@sntech.de> <2397969.FhQbyb98Gs@bagend> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240529_092448_208478_EE860524 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2024, 17:55:25 CEST schrieb Diederik de Haas: > On Thursday, 25 April 2024 17:19:58 CEST Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 18:19:04 +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > > > From: Andy Yan > > > > > > The port mux bits of VP2 should be defined by > > > RK3568_OVL_PORT_SET__PORT2_MUX, this maybe a copy and paste error when > > > this driver first introduced.> > > > Hi Heiko: > > > Maybe thi is the problem you met when you porting the dsi2 driver. > > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/1] drm/rockchip: vop2: Fix the port mux of VP2 > > commit: 2bdb481bf7a93c22b9fea8daefa2834aab23a70f > > Wasn't this patch supposed to be part of 6.10-rc1? Looking at the drm-misc tree, the last tag for the drm-misc to drm-main merge is labeled drm-misc-next-2024-04-25, same day as I applied the patch. In theory I think -rc6 is the cutoff for drm-misc changes for mainline, which would've been the 28th of april, but there might've been simple hickups preventing that last merge, resulting in the patch missing an early cutoff. On the other hand, somehow Torvald's tree actually has this commit [0], just with a "Notice: this object is not reachable from any branch." Possibly some drm-merge-mayhem? All very confusing. @Thomas, @Marten: do you possible have an idea what might've happened? Heiko [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2bdb481bf7a93c22b9fea8daefa2834aab23a70f _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel