From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: refactor items from Orange Pi 5/b to prep for Pro
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 19:35:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26834823.ouqheUzb2q@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429024737.544813-4-dennis@ausil.us>
Hi Dennis,
Am Mittwoch, 29. April 2026, 04:47:34 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> The RK806 PLDO1 and PLDO2 outputs are wired differently between the
> 5/5B and the Pro (PLDO1/PLDO2 are swapped), so label the PMIC node
> rk806_single in the base dtsi, drop pldo-reg1/pldo-reg2 from it, and
> define them via a &rk806_single regulators augmentation in
> rk3588s-orangepi-5-5b.dtsi. The Pro will supply its own mapping.
I guess my only question is, where did that "single" come from and what
is it supposed to mean? ... I would've assumed "&rk806" as label would've
been enough? But maybe that "_single" has some special meaning?
Thanks
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 2:47 [PATCH v9 0/4] Add support for Orange Pi 5 Pro Dennis Gilmore
2026-04-29 2:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add " Dennis Gilmore
2026-04-29 2:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-orangepi-5: rename PLDO regulator labels to match schematic Dennis Gilmore
2026-04-29 2:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: refactor items from Orange Pi 5/b to prep for Pro Dennis Gilmore
2026-05-05 17:35 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-05-05 20:30 ` Dennis Gilmore
2026-04-29 2:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Orange Pi 5 Pro board support Dennis Gilmore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26834823.ouqheUzb2q@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=alchark@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis@ausil.us \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox