Re: [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DTS for FriendlyARM NanoPi R2S Plus

["Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>]

Am Mittwoch, 14. August 2024, 14:24:03 CEST schrieb Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:36:43PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. August 2024, 13:21:38 CEST schrieb Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 09:11:56PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, 5. August 2024, 10:59:35 CEST schrieb Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan:
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 01:27:50AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 05:57:35PM +0000, Sergey Bostandzhyan wrote:
> > > > > > > The R2S Plus is basically an R2S with additional eMMC.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The eMMC configuration for the DTS has been extracted and copied from
> > > > > > > rk3328-nanopi-r2.dts, v2017.09 branch from the friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip
> > > > > > > repository.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Bostandzhyan <jin@mediatomb.cc>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |  1 +
> > > > > > >  .../dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dts   | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dts
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > > > > > > index fda1b980eb4b..36258dc8dafd 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > > > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-evb.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-nanopi-r2c.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-nanopi-r2c-plus.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-nanopi-r2s.dtb
> > > > > > > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-orangepi-r1-plus.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-orangepi-r1-plus-lts.dtb
> > > > > > >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3328-rock64.dtb
> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dts
> > > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > > index 000000000000..7b83090a2145
> > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2s-plus.dts
> > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > > + * (C) Copyright 2018 FriendlyElec Computer Tech. Co., Ltd.
> > > > > > > + * (http://www.friendlyarm.com)
> > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > + * (C) Copyright 2016 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +/dts-v1/;
> > > > > > > +#include "rk3328-nanopi-r2s.dts"
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +/ {
> > > > > > > +	model = "FriendlyElec NanoPi R2S Plus";
> > > > > > > +	compatible = "friendlyarm,nanopi-r2s-plus", "rockchip,rk3328";
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +	aliases {
> > > > > > > +		mmc1 = &emmc;
> > > > > > > +	};
> > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +&emmc {
> > > > > > > +	bus-width = <8>;
> > > > > > > +	cap-mmc-highspeed;
> > > > > > > +	supports-emmc;
> > > > > > > +	disable-wp;
> > > > > > > +	non-removable;
> > > > > > > +	num-slots = <1>;
> > > > > > > +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > > > > +	pinctrl-0 = <&emmc_clk &emmc_cmd &emmc_bus8>;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think it's worth adding
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I've tried getting the best speed possible and while HS400 with and
> > > > > > without enhanced strobe did NOT work, hs200 works just fine.
> > > > > > [    0.459863] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot req 52000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > > > > > [    0.460884] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 150000000Hz (slot req 150000000Hz, actual 150000000HZ div = 0)
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > [    0.728220] dwmmc_rockchip ff520000.mmc: Successfully tuned phase to 194
> > > > > > [    0.728940] mmc1: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
> > > > > > [    0.730774] mmcblk1: mmc1:0001 A3A551 28.9 GiB
> > > > > > [    0.733262]  mmcblk1: p1 p2
> > > > > > [    0.734562] mmcblk1boot0: mmc1:0001 A3A551 4.00 MiB
> > > > > > [    0.736818] mmcblk1boot1: mmc1:0001 A3A551 4.00 MiB
> > > > > > [    0.738503] mmcblk1rpmb: mmc1:0001 A3A551 16.0 MiB, chardev (245:0)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > root@OpenWrt:/# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > /dev/mmcblk1:
> > > > > >  Timing buffered disk reads: 342 MB in  3.00 seconds = 113.81 MB/sec
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Without 'mmc-hs200-1_8v' property in DT the eMMC is detected as
> > > > > > [    0.440465] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot req 52000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > > > > > [    0.442032] mmc1: new high speed MMC card at address 0001
> > > > > > [    0.444261] mmcblk1: mmc1:0001 A3A551 28.9 GiB
> > > > > > [    0.447388]  mmcblk1: p1 p2
> > > > > > [    0.448744] mmcblk1boot0: mmc1:0001 A3A551 4.00 MiB
> > > > > > [    0.451065] mmcblk1boot1: mmc1:0001 A3A551 4.00 MiB
> > > > > > [    0.452871] mmcblk1rpmb: mmc1:0001 A3A551 16.0 MiB, chardev (245:0)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > root@OpenWrt:/# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > /dev/mmcblk1:
> > > > > >  Timing buffered disk reads: 134 MB in  3.03 seconds =  44.18 MB/sec
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > +	status = "okay";
> > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm right now trying to get SDIO RTL8822CS working, so far I'm out of luck,
> > > > > > but it can be added later once we got it working.
> > > > > 
> > > > > would you be interested in taking over my attempted patches? Thing is,
> > > > > that I am a userspace guy who only copy-pasted some entries from
> > > > > FriendlyElec and things happened to work, but I really have no clue what I am
> > > > > doing when it comes to hardware and DTS. I see that some changes were suggested, 
> > > > > not only by you above, but also by others earlier and I have little
> > > > > understanding of where I should be inserting what and how.
> > > > > 
> > > > > At this point I think it would make more sense if someone who actually
> > > > > understands what they are doing would continue to tune the DTS :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > So it'd be great if either you or anyone else would be willing to take
> > > > > over?
> > > > 
> > > > Though, a board devicetree is a nice way to get "your feet wet" in the
> > > > kernel :-) and for a lot of people scratching ones own itches gets them
> > > > started.
> > > 
> > > While this may very well be true, my main issue is not the DT syntax,
> > > but the lack of understanding of the underlying hardware and also a lack of
> > > enthusiasm to dive into the hardware topics - I prefer to stay in
> > > userspace where the kernel provides a very nice abstraction to all those 
> > > details ;)
> > 
> > No worries :-) .
> > 
> > Though in this case you're "on the hook" for the board devicetree :-D .
> > 
> > 
> > > > The devicetree is easy enough, also looks correct and you even got the
> > > > binding change correct - and you're the person with the actual board :-) .
> > > > 
> > > > Could you possibly test if the   mmc-hs200-1_8v; property works for you?
> > > 
> > > It does, I get pretty much the same results as Daniel:
> > > 
> > > root@nanopi-r2s-plus:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk1
> > > /dev/mmcblk1:
> > >  Timing buffered disk reads: 134 MB in  3.04 seconds =  44.13 MB/sec
> > > 
> > > With mmc-hs200-1_8v:
> > > 
> > > root@nanopi-r2s-plus:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk1
> > >  /dev/mmcblk1:
> > >   Timing buffered disk reads: 340 MB in  3.01 seconds = 113.08 MB/sec
> > > 
> > > Should I add a commit on top with this change and submit a v3 patchset?
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 11:22:27PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > general remark, please don't send new versions as threaded replies to
> > > > old
> > > > versions. The normal case for git-send-email is to create a new thread
> > > > and this continuing inside the old thread confues tooling.
> > > 
> > > In case you tell me to go ahead with a v3 set, should it be in this
> > > thread or not? I understood RESEND's should be new, but updates should
> > > stay in the thread, right?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I actually did read the guides, but seems misunderstood what I should
> > > be doing as I inserted the in-reply-to header in my last RESEND.
> > 
> > Please do a v3 ... in a new thread.
> 
> There was one other note though to which I did not receive a clear
> repsonse. Bjoern A. Zeeb noticed, that the newer version from the
> rockhip repo has // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) while the
> one which I copied the code from did not have the "OR MIT" part, hence I
> also did not have it in my patch.
> 
> Am I supposed to leave it as is, since I copied the block from the
> sources which indeed were GP-2.0 only or should I add the "OR MIT" part
> as it is apparently the case in newer versions of the dts file from
> rockhcip?

the code you based your dts on changed licenses, so I guess you're also
allowed to change. You could very well also just have "copied it again"
from those new sources under GPL+MIT ;-)

And yep, dual licensing is preferred.

> > Also for the process, please add the Ack you received for patch 2
> > in that v3.
> 
> You mean, ammend the appropriate commit and add the Acked-By to the
> commit message? OK, will do.

correct. That is the expecting thing to do. DT maintainers see so many
patches that they won't keep track of "oh I have seen that already", so
would in the worst case, re-review the binding patch. By adding the Ack
they can just see (and probably tooling can simply filter out) those that
are already done.


> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:34:13PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 1:30 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 1:21 PM CEST, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
> > > wrote:
> > > > In case you tell me to go ahead with a v3 set, should it be in
> > > > this
> > > > thread or not? I understood RESEND's should be new, but updates
> > > > should
> > > > stay in the thread, right?
> > >
> > > No, a new series should be its own thread too.
> > 
> > More correctly and hopefully more clearly:
> 
> Understood, thank you!
> 
> Kind regards,
> Sergey
> 
>