From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hgkr.klein@gmail.com (Helmut Klein) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:03:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2,1/3] meson_uart: expose CLKID_UARTx In-Reply-To: <1490974657.12951.5.camel@baylibre.com> References: <20170328092545.4644-1-hgkr.klein@gmail.com> <20170328092545.4644-2-hgkr.klein@gmail.com> <1490716277.20764.6.camel@baylibre.com> <71489b62-78c8-7082-587e-8598dc43ca59@gmail.com> <1490728490.20764.8.camel@baylibre.com> <1490974657.12951.5.camel@baylibre.com> Message-ID: <26dd484d-f6fd-048d-7467-0fe9a1e6645b@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 31.03.2017 17:37, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 13:21 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Martin Blumenstingl writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> for Helmut this would mean that instead of dropping this patch (or >>> dropping CLKID_UART1 and CLKID_UART2 from this patch) he would rather >>> have to *add* another patch (for meson-gxbb.dtsi and meson-gxl.dtsi) >>> which passes the core clocks to the corresponding UART controllers >>> (similar to the CLKID_SD_EMMC_ clocks). >> >> Yes, this is what I would like to see. >> >> If a new CLKID is exposed, I want to see the users of it at the same >> time. > > Helmut, > > If you send another version of these patches, considering the feedback of Kevin > and Martin, could you please change the subject of this patch to: > > dt-bindings: clock: gxbb: expose UART clocks > > Thx > Jerome > i've just sent v3 of my patchset. (i changed the subjects of most patches in the set) Helmut >> >> Kevin >