From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:36:48 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 00/21] Various fixes and extensions to Exynos4 clock driver In-Reply-To: <20130403220118.3383.10734@quantum> References: <1364382178-25248-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1496108.NDegb7PXrt@flatron> <22e101ce2f7c$5b6a0cd0$123e2670$%kim@samsung.com> <20130403220118.3383.10734@quantum> Message-ID: <26e501ce30cc$7e4d4d60$7ae7e820$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-04-02 01:30:39) > > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday 30 of March 2013 15:33:00 Thomas Abraham wrote: > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > On 27 March 2013 16:32, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > This series is a collection of various fixes and extensions to > Exynos4 > > > > > clock driver, which improve coverage of clocks present on Exynos4 > SoCs > > > > > and fix problems discovered during our internal work and testing. > > > > > > > > Nice series. Thanks for the improvements and fixes. Looking at the > > > > second patch in this series, I crossed checked again with the > > > > Exynos4412 user manual that I have. Your modifications are different > > > > from what the manual has listed. I suspect, you have a newer copy of > > > > the manual. > > > > > > Right. I have checked revisions 0.0, 0.1 and 1.1 of the manual and > indeed > > > there are differences in clock layout between 0.1 and 1.1. My patches > are > > > based on revision 1.1. > > > > > Correct...hmm... > > > > > > For this series: > > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Abraham > > > > > Yes, looks good to me but would be better if I could get Mike's ack on > this > > series. > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette > Thanks, applied. - Kukjin