From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:13:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2740728.K6gusYnMDt@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554A11D5.9060407@free-electrons.com>
On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:06:29 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
> On 04/05/2015 22:08, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > This is v2 of the patch set to improve current mainline support for
> > the Compulab CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab
> > SBC-A510 base board.
> >
> > Compared to v1 [1] there have been the overall changes:
> > - Drop i2c-mux-pinctrl rework as Wolfram Sang raised concerns with
> > respect to OF_DYNAMIC. Instead we add i2c-mux-pinctrl node by
> > default and wait until corresponding driver respects disabled
> > sub-bus nodes. This will add 3 additional i2c busses to all
> > Dove based boards, but no functional change with respect to
> > i2c-0.
> > - Split patches dealing with arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile to route
> > them though arm-soc directly.
> >
> > Other patches of v1 have already been taken by MVEBU SoC maintainers
> > as fixes.
> >
> > Patches are based on v4.1-rc1 and are intended for v4.2. All patches
> > contain appropriate Acked-by's from related maintainers. Patches 3
> > and 5 should go thought arm-soc directly, the rest can go though
> > mvebu tree.
>
> Usually even the change of the arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile go to
> arm-soc through mvebu. For patch 5 it makes sens because if the series
> is spited then the Makefile could be merged before the new file
> to build.
>
> So unless, Arnd or Olof really want to pick the patches 3 and 5 I will
> apply the patches 2 to 5 on mvebu/dt.
>
> Arnd, Olof, do you agree?
Yes, please pick up all the patches and send them to us with your
normal pull requests.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 20:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-04 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-04 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-04 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: dts: dove: Remove Compulab CM-A510 from Makefile Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-04 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-04 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: dove: Add Compulab SBC-A510 to Makefile Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-06 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Gregory CLEMENT
2015-05-06 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-05-11 12:58 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2740728.K6gusYnMDt@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox