public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9 based tiles
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:13:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27584177.XzoGq1stOI@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3527082.WMy5vX2qZB@wuerfel>

On Tuesday 06 December 2011 23:53:46 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011 15:43:48 Pawel Moll wrote:
> > This patch adds Flattened Device Trees based support for ARM Ltd.
> > Versatile Express platforms based on Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9
> > processors.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Actually, I have to take that back. Looking at both patch 5 and 6,
the dt-ca*.c files are almost identical and all the differences are about stuff
that you can find in the device tree:

* The iotable gets initialized from "mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0", which would
be fine if that worked on all machines, but in order to unify the two
files, I would recommend searching the flat device tree for the respective
node and only map it if present.

* You have two ways of finding out the number of cores, but looking in
the device tree would just work either way.

* You set the twd_base unconditionally on a5/a9 but never on a7/a15.
This looks correct, but you could just as well see if a twd node exists
and use its base address.

* You only initialize the l2x0 on a5/a9. If a7/a15 don't have a matching
l2x0 device, then calling the same function unconditionally should be harmless.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-06 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-06 15:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] Versatile Express DT support Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ARM: versatile: Add missing ENDPROC to headsmp.S Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] ARM: vexpress: Get rid of MMIO_P2V Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] ARM: vexpress: Add DT support for the motherboard Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 22:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-08 10:37     ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-08 15:41       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ARM: vexpress: Motherboard RS1 memory map support Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9 based tiles Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:53   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 23:13     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-12-07 19:06       ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 22:50         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 15:08   ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 19:12     ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 15:33   ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 19:09     ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-08 11:40       ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15 " Pawel Moll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27584177.XzoGq1stOI@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox