linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, maz@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, apopple@nvidia.com, rananta@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com, shahuang@redhat.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: tlb: Allow range operation for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:43:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27718d41-32cb-4976-b50e-e9237da7aedf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405035852.1532010-4-gshan@redhat.com>

On 05/04/2024 04:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
> supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
> equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
> 
> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	 * When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
>  	 * (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
>  	 * When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> -	 * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
> +	 * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
>  	 */
>  	if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
>  	     (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> -	    pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> +	    pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {

As a further enhancement, I wonder if it might be better to test:

	pages * 4 / MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES > MAX_DVM_OPS

Then add an extra loop over __flush_tlb_range_op(), like KVM does.

The math is trying to express that there are a maximum of 4 tlbi range
instructions for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages (1 per scale) and we only need to
fall back to flushing the whole mm if it could generate more than MAX_DVM_OPS ops.

>  		flush_tlb_mm(vma->vm_mm);
>  		return;
>  	}


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05  3:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: tlb: Fix TLBI RANGE operand Gavin Shan
2024-04-05  3:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Gavin Shan
2024-04-05 17:10   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-08  8:29   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10  8:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-11  9:59       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10  7:55   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  3:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: tlb: Improve __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() Gavin Shan
2024-04-05 17:10   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-08  8:31   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10  7:57   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  3:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: tlb: Allow range operation for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES Gavin Shan
2024-04-05 17:12   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-08  8:43   ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-04-10  8:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-11 10:44       ` Will Deacon
2024-04-10  7:58   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-10  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: tlb: Fix TLBI RANGE operand Shaoqin Huang
2024-04-10 17:52 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2024-04-12 16:06 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27718d41-32cb-4976-b50e-e9237da7aedf@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).