[PATCH v0] arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for ROC-RK3399-PC board

Heiko Stuebner
2018-07-25T10:02:34Z

Hi Levin,

Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2018, 05:57:51 CEST schrieb djw at t-chip.com.cn:
> >> + vcc_vbus_typec0: vcc-vbus-typec0 {
> >> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >> + regulator-name = "vcc_vbus_typec0";
> >> + regulator-always-on;
> >> + regulator-boot-on;
> >> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> >> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + vcc12v_sys: mp8859-dcdc1 {
> >
> > The mp8859 seems to be an i2c-device, as also shown by the
> > nearly empty mp8859 entry below, so shouldn't this regulator
> > be defined there?
>
> Question here. Since mp8859 driver is not mainlined yet. Shall I leave
> the regulator here (mp8859 defaults to output 5V) and remove the
> mp8859 from the i2c?

Yep, sounds good ... also please add a comment of sorts that this is
temporary until the mp8859 has its own dt-binding.

> > [...]
> >
> >> + vcc_hub_en: vcc_hub_en-regulator {
> >> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >> + enable-active-high;
> >> + gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PA4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&hub_rst>;
> >> + regulator-name = "vcc_hub_en";
> >> + regulator-always-on;
> >
> > missing vin-supply
> This just comes in need of setting GPIO2_A4 (HUB_RST) to high
> This dummy regulator should be removed.
>
> I modify the pinctrl of hub_rst to output high:
>
> hub_rst: hub-rst {
> rockchip,pins = <2 RK_PA4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_output_high>;
> };
>
> and add hub_rst to the pinctrl-0 of vcc5v0_host:
>
> vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> enable-active-high;
> gpio = <&gpio1 RK_PA0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en &hub_rst>;
> regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
> regulator-always-on;
> vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
> };
>
> Tested show that it works. But is it the recommended way to set this
> gpio (HUB_RST) high? BTW, vcc5v0_host is the usb host voltage,
> and HUB_RST needs to set high for the usb hub chip to work.

It seems you can also model usb-hirarchy internals via the devicetree.
I guess for these things like soc-gpios and such. See
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.txt

While I don't know if this can handle such reset gpios yet, you
could at least move the pinctrl setting there.

> >> + reg = <0x66>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + fusb1: usb-typec at 22 {
> >> + compatible = "fcs,fusb302";
> >> + reg = <0x22>;
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&fusb1_int>;
> >> + fcs,int-n = <&gpio1 RK_PA1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >
> > mainline binding expects an "interrupts" property not the
> > fcs,int-n from above
> >
> It seems no existing user of fusb302 yet. I take that fcs,int-n
> from the driver code. But I look up the binding doc, and come
> with this result:
>
> fusb1: usb-typec at 22 {
> compatible = "fcs,fusb302";
> reg = <0x22>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&fusb1_int>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> status = "okay";
> };

looks good, except please move the interrupt* properties between reg
and pinctrl

Heiko