From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258CBC433EF for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB06860231 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:13:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org DB06860231 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yPv9FooO8s70v0wAaezVl22WnmXRYOeH/l0+cvzT9gY=; b=xvDr5c+47mft5Z s1Iwr/B6mW9W4rbTk6fnyhrH9KuBu9QW4rVE4Xsl65S/pYYVmI2SGmj32f+Mva6bzrqlTY+DlFyu0 aoOwEKS7v3wlUn870+ys6jCOT86mI7vr1RdV4tlnVkeUylWsJZuuI/iydaEjVb3p/tct9BnHFQj+Z QLEzINbwnrXg4kByOMeWAC/h8lOQTt5vdQaER7E2z5ReepvLaIgYPxOS8P5Fg9e8XZEZSpcGjUm8i pU5D/xbFR5YMhXrJcGUBQB6J2P0mVwNhJPssJtlrsVuxcySFchOT8kMRb2AmW73HgOgHPzYCtCctg Pk7kR8+l6LKoQi2nXdNw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhWAq-00GL4J-Pb; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:12:24 +0000 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhWAm-00GL0n-2n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:12:21 +0000 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R391e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e01424; MF=xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=14; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UuZrL7v_1635768735; Received: from 30.225.212.104(mailfrom:xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UuZrL7v_1635768735) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 20:12:16 +0800 Message-ID: <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 20:12:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering To: Will Deacon Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> From: Xuesong Chen In-Reply-To: <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_051220_363186_E76F4525 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Will, Thanks for the feedback! On 01/11/2021 17:36, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:18:35AM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: >> How about the status of this series, it's really bad, bad and still bad... to wait long >> time for the final judgement, especially you take extremely serious to rework it round >> by round, finaly you receive nothing. Everyone's work should be repected! > > I've trimmed the rest of your response as it wasn't especially constructive. > Please can you try to keep things civil, even when you're frustrated? It's > not very pleasant being on the end of a rant. I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression. > > One likely explanation for you not getting a reply on your patches is that > I've discovered many of your emails have ended up in my spam, for some > reason. I'm using gmail for my inbox so, if Bjorn is doing that as well, > then there's a good chance he hasn't seen them either. > > The other thing to keep in mind is that the 5.16 merge window opened today > and you posted the latest version of your patches on Wednesday. That doesn't > really leave enough time for the patches to be reviewed (noting that patch 3 > is new in this version and the kernel build robot was still complaining on > Friday), queued and put into linux-next, so I would suspect that this series > is looking more like 5.17 material and therefore not a priority for > maintainers at the moment. > > Your best is probably to post a v5, with the kbuild warnings addressed, > when -rc1 is released in a couple of weeks. I'm not sure how to fix the > spam issue though :( I've noticed the kbuild warning by the robot, so I plan to fix it and post the v5 soon. Thanks, Xuesong > > Will > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel