From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] arm64:thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium's Thunder SoC in 2 Node topology.
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2882934.brFyhkGPyE@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421924755-26029-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
On Thursday 22 January 2015 16:35:54 Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> +
> + cpu at 000 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0 0x000>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + /* socket 0, cluster 0, core 0*/
> + arm,associativity = <0 0 0>;
> + };
...
> + cpu at 20f {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0 0x20f>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + arm,associativity = <0 2 15>;
> + };
> + cpu at 10000 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + /* socket 1, cluster 0, core 0*/
> + arm,associativity = <1 0 0>;
> + };
This seems wrong still: The clusters and cores do not have unique
numbers. I believe the code will not work correctly, and it won't
be compliant with the binding from patch 2.
I think the right way here would be to use
arm,associativity = <0 2 47>;
for cpu at 20f, and
arm,associativity = <1 3 48>;
for cpu at 10000. Your previous version used the numbers from
the reg property, which should be fine as well if that helps:
arm,associativity = <0x0 0x200 0x20f>;
arm,associativity = <0x10000 0x10000 0x10000>;
which should have the same effect as above, as long as the code
can handle the numbers not being consecutive.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 11:05 [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] arm64:numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-01-22 11:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: defconfig: increase NR_CPUS range to 2-4096 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-01-22 11:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: arm64/arm: dt bindings for numa Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-01-22 11:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] arm64:thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium's Thunder SoC in 2 Node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-01-22 16:47 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-01-22 18:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-23 12:37 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-02-24 8:52 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-03-10 8:42 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-03-18 4:02 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-03-18 10:00 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-18 10:39 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-03-18 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-22 11:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] arm64:numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-02-27 9:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-29 10:57 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] arm64:numa: Add " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-06-30 14:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 14:22 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2882934.brFyhkGPyE@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox