public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASOC: rockchip: Use helper function devm_clk_get_enabled()
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:26:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2895073.PYKUYFuaPT@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f589ddf-e421-494f-85e5-1adebd19d03a@kylinos.cn>

On Friday, 6 June 2025 05:27:13 Central European Summer Time Pei Xiao wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/6/5 01:42, Nicolas Frattaroli 写道:
> > On Wednesday, 4 June 2025 05:13:30 Central European Summer Time Pei Xiao wrote:
> >> Since commit 7ef9651e9792 ("clk: Provide new devm_clk helpers for prepared
> >> and enabled clocks"), devm_clk_get() and clk_prepare_enable() can now be
> >> replaced by devm_clk_get_enabled() when driver enables the clocks for the
> >> whole lifetime of the device. Moreover, it is no longer necessary to
> >> unprepare and disable the clocks explicitly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
> >> ---
> >>  sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c | 8 +-------
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> >> index 79b04770da1c..2ec675708681 100644
> >> --- a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> >> +++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> >> @@ -1448,16 +1448,12 @@ static int rockchip_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  				     "Failed to get mclk\n");
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	sai->hclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
> >> +	sai->hclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
> >>  	if (IS_ERR(sai->hclk)) {
> >>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sai->hclk),
> >>  				     "Failed to get hclk\n");
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(sai->hclk);
> >> -	if (ret)
> >> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to enable hclk\n");
> >> -
> >>  	regmap_read(sai->regmap, SAI_VERSION, &sai->version);
> >>  
> >>  	ret = rockchip_sai_init_dai(sai, res, &dai);
> >> @@ -1512,8 +1508,6 @@ static int rockchip_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  	if (pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev))
> >>  		rockchip_sai_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> >>  err_disable_hclk:
> >> -	clk_disable_unprepare(sai->hclk);
> >> -
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>
> > Please get rid of the err_disable_hclk label, and change the
> >
> >     goto err_disable_hclk;
> >
> > in the resume failure condition to a 
> >
> >     return ret;
> May I ask, could we use the dev_err_probe function instead?
> 
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to initialize DAI\n");

Absolutely, dev_err_probe states the following in its documentation:

    Using this helper in your probe function is totally fine even if @err
    is known to never be -EPROBE_DEFER.

This means you can use it for every error case in the probe function.

> 
> 
> @@ -1441,28 +1441,22 @@ static int rockchip_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                                      "Failed to get mclk\n");
>         }
>  
> -       sai->hclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
> +       sai->hclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
>         if (IS_ERR(sai->hclk)) {
>                 return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sai->hclk),
>                                      "Failed to get hclk\n");
>         }
>  
> -       ret = clk_prepare_enable(sai->hclk);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to enable hclk\n");
> -
>         regmap_read(sai->regmap, SAI_VERSION, &sai->version);
>  
>         ret = rockchip_sai_init_dai(sai, res, &dai);
>         if (ret) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to initialize DAI: %d\n", ret);
> -               goto err_disable_hclk;
> +               return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to initialize DAI\n");
>         }

This would now be a one-line statement in the if branch, so checkpatch will
advise you to remove the redundant { } from the if, so that it becomes

    if (ret)
            return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to initialize DAI\n");

You can run `./scripts/checkpatch.pl` on either a git commit range or a
patch file, and it'll let you know. If you use b4, it'll run that
script with some recommended flags on all commits in your series with
`b4 prep --check`.

>  
>         ret = rockchip_sai_parse_paths(sai, node);
>         if (ret) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to parse paths: %d\n", ret);
> -               goto err_disable_hclk;
> +               return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to parse paths\n");
>         }

Same here

>  
>         /*
> @@ -1475,8 +1469,7 @@ static int rockchip_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>         ret = rockchip_sai_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
>         if (ret) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to resume device: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> -               goto err_disable_hclk;
> +               return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to resume device\n");
>         }

Same here

>  
>         ret = devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(&pdev->dev, NULL, 0);
> @@ -1504,8 +1497,6 @@ static int rockchip_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         /* If we're !CONFIG_PM, we get -ENOSYS and disable manually */
>         if (pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev))
>                 rockchip_sai_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> -err_disable_hclk:
> -       clk_disable_unprepare(sai->hclk);
>  
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> thanks!
> 
> Pei.

Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli

> 
> > Other than that, patch tested to be working fine.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Nicolas Frattaroli
> >
> >
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-04  3:13 [PATCH 0/2] Cleanup in rockchip_sai.c Pei Xiao
2025-06-04  3:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASOC: rochchip: Simplify the condition logic in rockchip_sai_xfer_stop Pei Xiao
2025-06-04 17:23   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-05  1:57     ` Pei Xiao
2025-06-05 14:30       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-04  3:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASOC: rockchip: Use helper function devm_clk_get_enabled() Pei Xiao
2025-06-04 17:42   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-05  2:00     ` Pei Xiao
2025-06-06  3:27     ` Pei Xiao
2025-06-06  8:26       ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2025-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] Cleanup in rockchip_sai.c Nicolas Frattaroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2895073.PYKUYFuaPT@workhorse \
    --to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaopei01@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox