From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:56:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Generic IOMMU page table framework
In-Reply-To: <20150119131843.GJ32131@arm.com>
References: <1420811657-21321-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
 <20150119130940.GJ6343@8bytes.org> <20150119131843.GJ32131@arm.com>
Message-ID: <2897578.zknPhjxUSB@avalon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Will,

On Monday 19 January 2015 13:18:43 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:09:41PM +0000, joro at 8bytes.org wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:01:31PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> I've not received any feedback on this revision of the series, but it's
> >> working well for me and Laurent showed that it works with his IOMMU too.
> >> 
> >> Joerg -- can I include this in my pull request for 3.20, or is there
> >> anything further you'd like me to address? The code is completely
> >> self-contained, so I wouldn't expect any impact on IOMMU drivers that
> >> don't explicitly use the new page table API.
> > 
> > The patch-set looks good to me. But with code generification in general,
> > what are the plans for other arm iommu drivers to adopt this?
> 
> I think Laurent was going to make use of it and I'm working on a driver
> that will use it too.
> 
> Laurent -- you had patches ready to go for v1, right?

Yes, and I've rebased them (or actually it, it's a single patch) on v2. I 
haven't had time to test the result yet, I'll try to do so later tonight or 
tomorrow.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart