Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/mediatek: check 4GB mode by reading infracfg

[Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>]

On 21/07/2020 13:24, Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 11:40 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 21/07/2020 04:16, Miles Chen wrote:
>>> In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
>>> use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
>>>
>>> Check 4GB mode by reading infracfg register, remove the usage
>>> of the un-exported symbol max_pfn.
>>>
>>> This is a step towards building mtk_iommu as a kernel module.
>>>
>>> Change since v1:
>>> 1. remove the phandle usage, search for infracfg instead [3]
>>> 2. use infracfg instead of infracfg_regmap
>>> 3. move infracfg definitaions to linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
>>> 4. update enable_4GB only when has_4gb_mode
>>>
>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/3/733
>>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/4/136
>>> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/15/1147
>>>
>>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>> Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>> Cc: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>> Cc: Chao Hao <chao.hao@mediatek.com>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c             | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>    include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h |  3 +++
>>>    2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> index 2be96f1cdbd2..16765f532853 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
>>>     * Copyright (c) 2015-2016 MediaTek Inc.
>>>     * Author: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>>     */
>>> -#include <linux/memblock.h>
>>>    #include <linux/bug.h>
>>>    #include <linux/clk.h>
>>>    #include <linux/component.h>
>>> @@ -15,13 +14,16 @@
>>>    #include <linux/iommu.h>
>>>    #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>>    #include <linux/list.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>>>    #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>    #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
>>>    #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>>    #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>    #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>>>    #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>    #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>> +#include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
>>>    #include <asm/barrier.h>
>>>    #include <soc/mediatek/smi.h>
>>>    
>>> @@ -599,8 +601,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    	struct resource         *res;
>>>    	resource_size_t		ioaddr;
>>>    	struct component_match  *match = NULL;
>>> +	struct regmap		*infracfg;
>>>    	void                    *protect;
>>>    	int                     i, larb_nr, ret;
>>> +	u32			val;
>>>    
>>>    	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>    	if (!data)
>>> @@ -614,10 +618,22 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    		return -ENOMEM;
>>>    	data->protect_base = ALIGN(virt_to_phys(protect), MTK_PROTECT_PA_ALIGN);
>>>    
>>> -	/* Whether the current dram is over 4GB */
>>> -	data->enable_4GB = !!(max_pfn > (BIT_ULL(32) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>>> -	if (!data->plat_data->has_4gb_mode)
>>> -		data->enable_4GB = false;
>>> +	data->enable_4GB = false;
>>> +	if (data->plat_data->has_4gb_mode) {
>>> +		infracfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(
>>> +				"mediatek,mt8173-infracfg");
>>> +		if (IS_ERR(infracfg)) {
>>> +			infracfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(
>>> +					"mediatek,mt2712-infracfg");
>>> +			if (IS_ERR(infracfg))
>>> +				return PTR_ERR(infracfg);
>>
>> I think we should check m4u_plat instead to decide which compatible we have to
>> look for.
>> Another option would be to add a general compatible something like
>> "mtk-infracfg" and search for that. That would need an update of all DTS having
>> a infracfg compatible right now. After thinking twice, this would break newer
>> kernel with older device tree, so maybe it's better to go with m4u_plat switch
>> statement.
> 
> Add a "char *infracfg" in the plat_data, Use the mt2712, mt8173
> corresponding string in it. If it is NULL, It means the "enable_4GB"
> always is false. Then we also can remove the flag "has_4gb_mode".
> 
> is this OK?
> 

It's an option, but I personally find that a bit hacky.

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel