From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [PATCH 13/13] clk: basic: improve parent_names & return errors In-Reply-To: References: <1334192572-12499-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> <1334192572-12499-14-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> <20120412064920.GH2445@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <293d03fc4c269b5359c0826b982cc4be.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, April 17, 2012 12:17 am, Shawn Guo wrote: > On 17 April 2012 11:50, Turquette, Mike wrote: >> That is a good question. ?I think it is worth waiting on Saravana's >> patch which exposes non-private members of struct clk via struct >> clk_hw. ?This will have an effect on both platform clock data and >> code. > > Saravana, > > (*nudge*) (*nudge*) goes to you now :) > Done! I especially like how it turned out. -Saravana -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.