linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/rockchip: Handle errors returned from PM framework
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:09:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2940317.dDZy1L4CDY@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807085406.3863-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

Am Dienstag, 7. August 2018, 10:54:05 CEST schrieb Marc Zyngier:
> pm_runtime_get_if_in_use can fail: either PM has been disabled
> altogether (-EINVAL), or the device hasn't been enabled yet (0).
> Sadly, the Rockchip IOMMU driver tends to conflate the two things
> by considering a non-zero return value as successful.
> 
> This has the consequence of hiding other bugs, so let's handle this
> case throughout the driver, with a WARN_ON_ONCE so that we can try
> and work out what happened.
> 
> Fixes: 0f181d3cf7d98 ("iommu/rockchip: Add runtime PM support")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

I'm still not sure about the !CONFIG_PM case, as it was probably silently
working in that case before.

But on the other hand we're also already running over it in other places
like in the iommu-shutdown and I guess if someone _really_ disabled
CONFIG_PM, a lot of additional stuff would fail anyway.


So should we wrap that in some #ifdef magic, just ignore it or simply
select PM similar to what Tegra, Renesas and Vexpress seem to do?

I guess I like the 3rd option best ;-)


Heiko



>  drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> index 054cd2c8e9c8..4e0f9b61cd7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> @@ -521,10 +521,11 @@ static irqreturn_t rk_iommu_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	u32 int_status;
>  	dma_addr_t iova;
>  	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> -	int i;
> +	int i, err;
>  
> -	if (WARN_ON(!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev)))
> -		return 0;
> +	err = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev);
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err <= 0))
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(clk_bulk_enable(iommu->num_clocks, iommu->clocks)))
>  		goto out;
> @@ -620,11 +621,15 @@ static void rk_iommu_zap_iova(struct rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain,
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rk_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
>  	list_for_each(pos, &rk_domain->iommus) {
>  		struct rk_iommu *iommu;
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		iommu = list_entry(pos, struct rk_iommu, node);
>  
>  		/* Only zap TLBs of IOMMUs that are powered on. */
> -		if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev)) {
> +		ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev);
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0))
> +			continue;
> +		if (ret) {
>  			WARN_ON(clk_bulk_enable(iommu->num_clocks,
>  						iommu->clocks));
>  			rk_iommu_zap_lines(iommu, iova, size);
> @@ -891,6 +896,7 @@ static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	struct rk_iommu *iommu;
>  	struct rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain = to_rk_domain(domain);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Allow 'virtual devices' (eg drm) to detach from domain */
>  	iommu = rk_iommu_from_dev(dev);
> @@ -909,7 +915,9 @@ static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	list_del_init(&iommu->node);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rk_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
>  
> -	if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev)) {
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
> +	if (ret > 0) {
>  		rk_iommu_disable(iommu);
>  		pm_runtime_put(iommu->dev);
>  	}
> @@ -946,7 +954,8 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	list_add_tail(&iommu->node, &rk_domain->iommus);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rk_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
>  
> -	if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev))
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(iommu->dev);
> +	if (!ret || WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0))
>  		return 0;
>  
  	ret = rk_iommu_enable(iommu);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-07 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-07  8:54 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes Marc Zyngier
2018-08-07  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/rockchip: Handle errors returned from PM framework Marc Zyngier
2018-08-07 12:09   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2018-08-07 12:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-07 13:15       ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-08-07 14:25         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-08  6:30           ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-08-08  6:33   ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-08-07  8:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/rockchip: Move irq request past pm_runtime_enable Marc Zyngier
2018-08-07 11:45   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2940317.dDZy1L4CDY@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).