From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB1CC433E1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE1C20714 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LU6PTWtb"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Os/0wGVh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4FE1C20714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EfFgUJowrUzwobgjHEy2uOiZVZcd2Lr+vU3A9LM/nLM=; b=LU6PTWtbpEbox0fv/uaYsASWp JPBcd27xppNq6ZkaoXBYQlJ3X0m6wg1L9GfuVBc1i3OnbMi0yXBXd1JL1dxKsiZBPhFeTW4wGJGNq Z7Sp7u7RSZOky6iiIMMLJdim4QGHEWS2JmYym2FYSn6+0HCKDmBvTjKF7FcE4jKbuNxHdEnO/WrGS CUKUHBeNluCcWZBSMkjUyvKu27K6jWDXbl/zYbVlNLXDUy9wbbWWer733CX2UfMs3KjJBRr+L41qB LXoTwn+3q/+hMQDYnHDMO9MPuGX6E0ztBLw/6sPu1Sv0/6Zx3Fc5hxTcnhim9+N13GfRAZrraHgzL 4mjf1201w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyWV0-0002QW-SM; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:22:42 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyWUx-0002PR-IB; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:22:40 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id g10so5975502wmc.1; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:22:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QE10UDZQ3r5KctDFG038ZVtepXURxKEMA8qw8LlWSEY=; b=Os/0wGVhINaT50kNjojm42n5UockuOvesYAtUK3exVVbKcF5f/N0XQJlTarczwHRKU uy4WrGbGX1HgDZMJHOdn3+fUrZAGtEXkfou9SSW+pVYhvrjkV2mNzquCZEHE3xVGY5bX yb8pittSkp1e5A7ZkSg9Y0HFp6327SPU3I6nl0kxxOUfWE3jePiiSvpBvwpvjKVJKel/ kTZsuoKzZsMGOPRrf49CbzEGxqQbmm04QK+emJHbt/jYHbzENz/h8MGC9vyIFLZOOhFJ S5/Oh3RUNtI9ver6zN0JtaKBYLBePUSrdcKiCcOCRTMnMZ/BIC8k+OZ6URKGLL3aY+NT ERrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QE10UDZQ3r5KctDFG038ZVtepXURxKEMA8qw8LlWSEY=; b=M4wXEV/F6WB56OdFv6BwpkCXjGLjAU5IxqQGuOfQBVYDrTvBkEnxTY7unfCLgk2siI 57PSBwij9PKn4vK/I7venKGTbPOAKU1fEz0DJB6n0sIXzFS8HaRVxsh6WDecfLgF0S6w 8FpdF0+MCifdjKoFbRJeczLt+qPQ6CZHm+ruuKJA1ap/kKcHJyzX3KS5dYjQRsRlFsA8 iYJ/5v6BREwI61oaMWq3h9/NQRFve8CYw7ovIXiuaqH2IrmymYi5+8mxAj/APrwu/tv0 0mg5o4syiC4T16vN9hhF1Ahhx9Ste7qo85N2QYDJzESMIGs7BKoefbE2MnR7G5RXJ3xw EHQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XwstnnYI4BRm41U4LPcRGsKcPN197D88fe6q2s2z4D2vChV0s O8JR0fQugYWZye4NC7TaYVRNogz0pIY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRo2CpLckZ5BybV2p2mZPEKIPpKjjoDDNVlus8LUvOzoTI2kUV/qOMer0ffg8TPEA8+n5kqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:df02:: with SMTP id w2mr436740wmg.137.1595492556305; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziggy.stardust ([213.195.122.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12sm2805882wrj.48.2020.07.23.01.22.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: update bindings for MT8192 SoC To: Mark Brown , Leilk Liu References: <20200721024819.7150-1-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <20200721094859.GB4845@sirena.org.uk> From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <2a1cfaf2-0c58-e0c9-7c70-20a2f84321f9@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:22:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200721094859.GB4845@sirena.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200723_042239_690137_AEFB9751 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 21/07/2020 11:48, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:48:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: >> From: "leilk.liu" >> >> Add a DT binding documentation for the MT8192 soc. > > I'd expect to see a matching driver patch. > Well for now the device would match against the "mediatek,mt6765-spi" as it is the same chip. We just want to define the binding so that we could add a special case for mt8192 in the future, if needed. Regards, Matthias _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel