From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:28:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Add pci=safemode option
In-Reply-To: <20180530145650.GA39853@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
References: <1527650389-31575-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
 <20180530043103.GA19734@kroah.com>
 <6c317ed8-cca3-8862-5f3b-12cf14e4d53b@codeaurora.org>
 <20180530073735.GA28793@infradead.org>
 <6dfe2db8f974d94c9867f30ec83d9333@codeaurora.org>
 <20180530145650.GA39853@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Message-ID: <2a5281cd-a0c7-1449-5b72-133660667fa6@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 5/30/2018 10:56 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This *was* my idea, but I'm starting to think it was a bad idea.
> 
> I don't want people to use pci= parameters as the normal way to get a
> system to boot.  That would be a huge support hassle (putting things
> in release notes, diagnosing problems when people forget it, etc).
> 
> But the parameters *are* useful for debugging.  If we had a
> "pci=safemode" and it avoided some problem, the next step would be to
> narrow it down by using the more specific flags (pci=nomsi, pci=noari,
> pci=no_ext_tags, etc).  So I think 95% of the value is in the specific
> flags, and a "pci=safemode" might add a little bit of value but at the
> cost of a small but nagging maintenance concern and code clutter.

OK. Let's try noXYZ feature. Can you enumerate the XYZ features that you
want to see?

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.