From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com (Jean-Philippe Brucker)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:25:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/16] virtio: Validate queue pfn for 32bit transports
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9VJ41vPBOwYSVHmBGtjdA4jL2b2mHAUZ09aym_JynMzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180109190414.4017-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <20180109190414.4017-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <20180110012429-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <f53478fc-c0c1-7502-1b8c-c23e332cae9c@arm.com>
 <20180110130230-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <CAFEAcA9VJ41vPBOwYSVHmBGtjdA4jL2b2mHAUZ09aym_JynMzw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2aacb81b-0efb-87b9-f70c-a61e66dd0331@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Peter,

On 10/01/18 11:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 January 2018 at 11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>> For virtio-mmio? I don't seem to see that code in
>> hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
>> For example I still see handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_PFN
>> there, and no handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_DESC_LOW
>> and such.
> 
> Are there uses that make it worthwhile to get virtio-1
> support added to virtio-mmio, rather than just getting
> people to move over to virtio-pci instead ?

virtio-iommu uses virtio-mmio transport. It makes little sense to have an
IOMMU presented as a PCI endpoint.

Thanks,
Jean