From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:16:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: smp: Prevent raw_smp_processor_id() recursion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2bd54897-df2e-a20e-d748-07966642b850@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/12/16 15:55, Robin Murphy wrote: > Under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y, this_cpu_ptr() ends up calling back into > raw_smp_processor_id(), resulting in some hilariously catastrophic > infinite recursion. In the normal case, we have: > > #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) > > and everything is dandy. However for CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, this_cpu_ptr() > is defined in terms of my_cpu_offset, wherein the fun begins: > > #define my_cpu_offset per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()) > ... > #define smp_processor_id() debug_smp_processor_id() > ... > notrace unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void) > { > return check_preemption_disabled("smp_processor_id", ""); > ... > notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1, > const char *what2) > { > int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > > and bang. Use raw_cpu_ptr() directly to avoid that. > > Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski > Acked-by: Will Deacon > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy I wasn't sure whether commit IDs on for-next/core are stable, but if they are, this could also have: Fixes: 57c82954e77f ("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable") Robin. > --- > > Since I just reproduced this locally to verify Will's suggestion, it > seemed I might as well just write it up as a patch :) > > arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h > index a62db952ffcb..d050d720a1b4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h > @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number); > * We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to > * preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid > * the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. > + * And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back > + * here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. > */ > -#define raw_smp_processor_id() (*this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) > +#define raw_smp_processor_id() (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) > > struct seq_file; > >