Re: [PATCH v15 00/12] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	singo.chang@mediatek.com, Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"roy-cw.yeh" <roy-cw.yeh@mediatek.com>,
	CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	nancy.lin@mediatek.com,
	"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/12] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:09:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bdbe214-7add-f529-db8f-d0e998a540e5@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c19b14ab9a8879fc50d8bcc87745da48491be373.camel@mediatek.com>

Il 04/03/22 06:26, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> Because linux-next has applied these patches:
> 
> [v15,04/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsc: add yaml for mt8195
> SoC binding
> [v15,05/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: merge: add additional prop
> for mt8195
> [v15,06/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add mt8195 SoC binding for
> vdosys0
> [v15,03/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: disp: split each block to
> individual yaml
> 
> 
> I'll rebase on the latest linux-next, and then send 1 path + 1 series:
> [1] a fix up patch for all dt-schema error in each display dt-bindings
> (If Rob wants me to split this patch into separate patches for each
> file, then I'll resend it.)
> [2] a series of remaining patches of this series
> 
> 
> I would appreciate it if you would take the time to send [1] for me.
> If you can help me to send [1], please let me know.
> Thank you very much ;-)
> 
> 

I will send fixes for [1] later today.

Cheers,
Angelo

> Regards,
> Jason-JH.Lin
> 
> On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 10:31 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 03/03/22 05:25, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 17:50 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 1:19 AM jason-jh.lin <
>>>> jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
>> Hello Rob, Jason-JH,
>>
>> I have just crafted a patch that fixes everything mentioned here,
>> if it's easier like this, I can either send it for the maintainer(s)
>> to apply on top, or squash in Jason-JH's original patch.
>>
>> If you'd like to get my patch, though, I have one question:
>> this is touching literally all of the YAML files that Jason-JH is
>> introducing, so, should I send this as one patch per file (which
>> would be
>> something around 16 patches) or is just one fixing them all fine?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Angelo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-mediatek mailing list
>> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3tXE3T-t6I2GMILAOHpkTXhrLHwFAQtmhGqTBtKSY2SLWM2qBBMULlM17TtG6VwNR5yn$
>>   

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel