From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E905C43467 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CCB9206A1 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="08QcRfkt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CCB9206A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=oVFr0WeCqsBZqjflZU3x566400EZbf5FARS5BjqI544=; b=08QcRfkt95IA5hdZI7yu0RMMd 1LDJMRBGTMxAUW5JaauEj1fk39dzi2TK09TheIHzfNDU9zMlLcgVtehLAtCxRu8M2SU/copoeH7HI KzZmYYbXCvgJkz5FtvhDu+y4eyj5l4FOBIlkB8LB1H6iKIGG39SHMoABP1Mh8UBFRQn9/flSDGnux zvKYgrCsBYtVCBdwXGnAyKXHiQ6UC2x20E2fd0mlRH28eK5cwg7tVymKvZvOQMXf5MINPKLKl3x6S 0LKUz3OWyPK60J0ahzFgRQicpePrOxCjn5+haantPnu/aTrv37LJkPLh5cvavVBVmiTmKA4kCmi8o Hso1+fAlA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQUTn-0005mb-AM; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:53:03 +0000 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQUTA-0005XE-2C for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:52:30 +0000 Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id ECF6381D48C2EA3B2156; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:52:20 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.210.169.237) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:52:19 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs To: kajoljain , "acme@kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "jolsa@redhat.com" , "irogers@google.com" , "leo.yan@linaro.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" , "mathieu.poirier@linaro.org" References: <1602152121-240367-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1f1c4537-2224-cd83-a10a-947ef8cd2864@linux.ibm.com> From: John Garry Message-ID: <2ca3d31e-478f-5e0a-dd36-37e84e4abf7c@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:49:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1f1c4537-2224-cd83-a10a-947ef8cd2864@linux.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.210.169.237] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml730-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.81) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201008_075224_290772_EA20BE54 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com" , Linuxarm , Zhangshaokun , "james.clark@arm.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-imx@nxp.com" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 08/10/2020 12:27, kajoljain wrote: > Hi John, > I am looking into these patches, it seems they are not re-based on top of > latest Arnaldo's perf/core branch. Can you rebase these changes. I think we are missing > multiple updates. > > > Thanks, > Kajol Jain > Hi Kajol Jain, My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here. However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as baseline, so I'll look at that now. Thanks, John [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1602149181-237415-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com/T/#mc34f758ab72f3d4a90d854b9bda7e6bbb90835b2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel