From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dave.martin@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:48:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cad039a-63ee-4340-a9f7-d8aaeeda593a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165e7636-d7e9-4d16-aad1-657b4a9698d0@intel.com>
Ran few tests on the series. Everything looks good.
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
On 7/14/2026 12:45 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Dear x86 maintainers,
>
> Could you please consider this series for inclusion? It applies cleanly on top
> of x86/cache with HEAD at
> 2566b5cd6a27 ("fs/resctrl: Fix UAF from worker threads when domains are removed")
>
> Please note that this is the first instance of a series that touches resctrl fs, x86, and
> Arm. Since this is a resctrl fs API change these patches should stay together. You will
> find in Ben's message below that patch routing via tip is supported by Arm.
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Reinette
>
> On 7/9/26 2:31 AM, Ben Horgan wrote:
>> This version fixes a couple of non-functional mistakes in v4 pointed out by Reinette.
>>
>> The patches should stay together so please could this all go via tip.
>>
>> Changelogs in patches.
>>
>> From cover letter of v3:
>>
>> This is a new version of Dave Martin's patch [1] to delegate rounding of
>> bandwidth control user values to the arch code. As there is now more than one
>> architecture using resctrl, I split the original patch into two, a core resctrl
>> patch and an x86 patch, and added an MPAM patch. Please let me know if the patch
>> break down and ordering is sensible and whether the pattern should be followed
>> for any future similar changes.
>>
>> This does have a user visible effect on MB schema when using MPAM hardware
>> with 'bandwidth_gran' greater than 1. I'm not sure if MPAM hardware with such
>> coarse controls exists in the wild but it is spec compliant and I've tested it
>> on a model.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251031154225.14799-1-Dave.Martin@arm.com/
>>
>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260515140612.1205251-1-ben.horgan@arm.com/
>> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260706160639.2136674-1-ben.horgan@arm.com/
>>
>> Based on v7.2-rc2
>>
>> Ben Horgan (1):
>> arm_mpam: resctrl: Add pass-through resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw()
>>
>> Dave Martin (2):
>> x86,fs/resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw()
>> fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch
>>
>> Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst | 17 +++++++++--------
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 5 +++++
>> fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 6 +++---
>> include/linux/resctrl.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 9:31 [PATCH v5 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 9:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86,fs/resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw() Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 9:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add pass-through resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw() Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 9:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch Ben Horgan
2026-07-14 17:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: " Reinette Chatre
2026-07-14 22:48 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2026-07-14 23:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-15 0:13 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cad039a-63ee-4340-a9f7-d8aaeeda593a@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox