Re:Re: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/rockchip: Add driver for the new DSI2 controller

["Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com>]

Hi Dmitry,

在 2024-12-10 09:45:11，"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> 写道：
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 03:22, Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> 在 2024-12-10 09:01:38，"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> 写道：
>> >On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 08:50:51AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> At 2024-12-10 07:12:26, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>> >> >Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2024, 17:11:03 CET schrieb Diederik de Haas:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 4:06 PM CET, Daniel Semkowicz wrote:
>> >> >> > On 03.12.24 21:54, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> >> >> > > This series adds a bridge and glue driver for the DSI2 controller found
>> >> >> > > in the rk3588 soc from Rockchip, that is based on a Synopsis IP block.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I did more tests with different LVDS displays. I tested following
>> >> >> > configurations with DSI/LVDS bridge:
>> >> >> > - 1024x600@60.01
>> >> >> > - 1024x768@60.02
>> >> >> > - 1280x800@60.07
>> >> >> > - 1366x768@60.06
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > All of them worked without issues, except 1366x768.
>> >> >> > With this resolution, video is blurry, and offset incorrectly
>> >> >> > to the left. There are also repeating errors on the console:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >   rockchip-drm display-subsystem: [drm] *ERROR* POST_BUF_EMPTY irq err at vp3
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > In correct operation with other resolutions, there is no error.
>> >> >> > I am not sure if this is a problem in your series or rather in VOP2
>> >> >> > driver.
>> >> >
>> >> >This really sounds like something is wrong on the vop side.
>> >> >The interrupt is part of the vop, the divisable by 4 things likely too.
>> >>
>> >> This is a hardware limitation on vop side:
>> >> The horizontal resolution must be 4 pixel aligned.
>> >
>> >Then mode_valid() and atomic_check() must reject modes that don't fit.
>>
>> We round down to 4 pixel aligned in mode_fixup in our bsp kernel,
>
>What is meant by the "bsp kernel" here? I don't see it being present

bsp kernel means downstream vendor kernel.

>in the mainline kernel. So, if the mode is unsupported, it should be

Will it be acceptable to add this round down in the mainline mode_fixup?

>rejected.
>
>> because sometimes, some boards do indeed choose a screen that is not 4 pixel aligned
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >--
>> >With best wishes
>> >Dmitry
>
>
>
>-- 
>With best wishes
>Dmitry