From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:46:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm64: move thread_info off of the task stack In-Reply-To: <20161024180941.GT15620@leverpostej> References: <1476904234-9511-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <10401f46-cabc-23ec-a448-c377dbce7911@redhat.com> <20161024174840.GR15620@leverpostej> <20161024180941.GT15620@leverpostej> Message-ID: <2db24d48-3a8a-11c2-9b2c-26a51a3baa36@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/24/2016 11:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:58:10AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 10/24/2016 10:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>> On 10/19/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>>> [3] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/ti-stack-split >>> >>>> I pulled the arm64/ti-stack-split branch on top of a Fedora >>>> tree and ran back-to-back kernel RPM builds for a long weekend. >>>> It's still going as of this morning so you can take that as a >>>> >>>> Tested-by: Laura Abbott >>> >>> Thanks! That's much appreciated! >>> >>> Just to check, did you grab the version with entry.S fixes rolled in >>> (where the head is 657f54256c427fec)? >> >> Ah I did not. That came in after I started the test. I'll start >> another run with the new version. > > Sorry about that; thanks for respinning! > > It's really crazy how broken a kernel can be yet still "work"; clearly > we better tests are needed. :/ > > Thanks, > Mark. > While not as long running, I gave it another spin and it seemed to work fine as well. Thanks, Laura