From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:07:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] coresight: etm-perf: Add support for ETR backend In-Reply-To: <20180719195949.GA9421@xps15> References: <1531847501-22226-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <1531847501-22226-11-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20180719195949.GA9421@xps15> Message-ID: <2e3a1a45-d71c-2f63-0ec9-9a8071a491f1@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19/07/18 20:59, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> Add support for using TMC-ETR as backend for ETM perf tracing. >> We use software double buffering at the moment. i.e, the TMC-ETR >> uses a separate buffer than the perf ring buffer. The data is >> copied to the perf ring buffer once a session completes. >> >> The TMC-ETR would try to match the larger of perf ring buffer >> or the ETR buffer size configured via sysfs, scaling down to >> a minimum limit of 1MB. >> >> Cc: Mathieu Poirier >> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose >> --- >> + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); >> + >> + tmc_flush_and_stop(drvdata); >> + tmc_sync_etr_buf(drvdata); >> + >> + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); > > This is a copy/paste oversight, here you want to lock again. Thanks for catching that, will fix it. > >> + /* Reset perf specific data */ >> + drvdata->perf_data = NULL; >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags); >> + >> + size = etr_buf->len; >> + tmc_etr_sync_perf_buffer(etr_perf); >> + >> + /* >> + * Update handle->head in snapshot mode. Also update the size to the >> + * hardware buffer size if there was an overflow. >> + */ >> + if (etr_perf->snapshot) { >> + handle->head += size; >> + if (etr_buf->full) >> + size = etr_buf->size; >> + } >> + >> + lost |= etr_buf->full; >> +out: >> + if (lost) >> + perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED); >> + return size; >> +} >> + >> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data) >> { >> - /* We don't support perf mode yet ! */ >> - return -EINVAL; >> + int rc = 0; >> + unsigned long flags; >> + struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent); >> + struct perf_output_handle *handle = data; >> + struct etr_perf_buffer *etr_perf = etm_perf_sink_config(handle); >> + >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags); >> + /* >> + * There can be only one writer per sink in perf mode. If the sink >> + * is already open in SYSFS mode, we can't use it. >> + */ >> + if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || drvdata->perf_data) { >> + rc = -EBUSY; As discussed in the previous patch, I am missing a WARN_ON here : i.e, + if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || WARN_ON(drvdata->perf_data)) which was there in the previous version in set_buffer, which triggered some warnings for me with testing. >> + goto unlock_out; >> + } >> + >> + if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf)) { >> + rc = -EINVAL; >> + goto unlock_out; >> + } >> + >> + etr_perf->head = PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, etr_perf); >> + drvdata->perf_data = etr_perf; >> + drvdata->mode = CS_MODE_PERF; >> + tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf); >> + >> +unlock_out: >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags); >> + return rc; >> } >> >> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, >> @@ -1148,6 +1389,9 @@ static void tmc_disable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev) >> static const struct coresight_ops_sink tmc_etr_sink_ops = { >> .enable = tmc_enable_etr_sink, >> .disable = tmc_disable_etr_sink, >> + .alloc_buffer = tmc_etr_alloc_perf_buffer, >> + .update_buffer = tmc_etr_update_perf_buffer, >> + .free_buffer = tmc_etr_free_perf_buffer, > > > .alloc_buffer = tmc_alloc_etr_buffer, > .update_buffer = tmc_update_etr_buffer, > .free_buffer = tmc_free_etr_buffer, > > To be consistant with .enable and .disable along with the naming convention on > the ETF side. Sure, I can change them. Cheers Suzuki