linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "'oliver.upton@linux.dev'" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	"Ricardo Koller" <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	"Reiji Watanabe" <reijiw@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	"Colton Lewis" <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 21:54:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ec9ecbfb13d422ab6cda355ff011c9f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b1040c48bc9b2986798322c336660ab@linux.dev>

From: oliver.upton@linux.dev
> Sent: 16 June 2022 19:45

> 
> June 16, 2022 11:48 AM, "David Laight" <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> > No wonder I was confused.
> > It's not surprising the compiler optimises it all away.
> >
> > It doesn't seem right to be 'abusing' WRITE_ONCE() here.
> > Just adding barrier() should be enough and much more descriptive.
> 
> I had the same thought, although I do not believe barrier() is sufficient
> on its own. barrier_data() with a pointer to uc passed through
> is required to keep clang from eliminating the dead store.

A barrier() (full memory clobber) ought to be stronger than
the partial one than barrier_data() generates.

I can't quite decide whether you need a barrier() both sides
of the 'magic write'.
Plausibly the compiler could discard the on-stack data
after the barrier() and before the 'magic write'.

Certainly putting the 'magic write' inside a asm block
that has a memory clobber is a more correct solution.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 18:57 [PATCH] selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2022-06-16 12:02 ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-16 15:58   ` David Laight
2022-06-16 16:25     ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-16 16:48       ` David Laight
2022-06-16 18:44       ` oliver.upton
2022-06-16 21:54         ` David Laight [this message]
2022-06-17  7:28           ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-17  9:22             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-16 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ec9ecbfb13d422ab6cda355ff011c9f@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).