From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:27:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] thermal: rockchip: add tsadc support in thermal
 driver and IPA thermal control for rk3328 in dts
In-Reply-To: <1502427095.2598.21.camel@intel.com>
References: <1501833976-1100-1-git-send-email-rocky.hao@rock-chips.com>
 <1502427095.2598.21.camel@intel.com>
Message-ID: <3025917.NAhhjSz36M@phil>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

Am Freitag, 11. August 2017, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Zhang Rui:
> On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 16:06 +0800, Rocky Hao wrote:
> > This series patches add the tsadc support in thermal driver and in
> > devicetree for rk3328.
> > Also add thermal control with Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA)
> > policy by default.  Please
> > refer to https://developer.arm.com/open-source/intelligent-power-allo
> > cation for more information
> > about IPA.
> > 
> > Rocky Hao (5):
> >   dt-bindings: rockchip-thermal: Support the RK3328 SoC compatible
> >   thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3328 SOC in thermal driver
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: add tsadc node for rk3328 SoC
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: add thermal nodes for rk3328 SoC
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable tsadc module on RK3328 eavluation
> > board
> > 
> I can take this patch set if we have ACK for patch 3, 4 and 5.

I would prefer if you would just apply patches 1+2 alone and I'd take
the devicetree patches through my tree.

Having devicetree stuff mingle in a lot of trees produces unnecessary
conflicts, so the general best practice is having code + binding.txt
going through the driver tree and devicetree stuff through the platform
tree.


Thanks
Heiko