[RFC PATCH] arm64: defconfig: enable SMMUv3 config

[arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)]

On Friday, January 13, 2017 3:35:54 PM CET Wei Xu wrote:
> On 2017/1/12 9:47, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:36:12AM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/9 19:50, Zhou Wang wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> index 869dded..3520c50 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ CONFIG_PLATFORM_MHU=y
> >>>  CONFIG_BCM2835_MBOX=y
> >>>  CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y
> >>>  CONFIG_ARM_SMMU=y
> >>> +CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3=y
> >>>  CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_POWER=y
> >>>  CONFIG_QCOM_SMEM=y
> >>>  CONFIG_QCOM_SMD=y
> >>
> >> I just happened to find there is no SMMUv3 config in arm64 defconfig.
> >>
> >> Maybe we should add it in defconfig or I miss something.
> > 
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> > It looks fine to me but it's usually the arm-soc guys picking the
> > defconfig patches.
> > 
> 
> It is fine to me.
> Is it OK for me to pick up this or will you directly pick up this?
> Thanks!

Either way works for me. I usually recommend platform maintainers
picking up patches and then sending them on to arm at kernel.org,
as that gets our attention quicker. A patch that gets sent with
me personally on Cc might get lost in the email.

	Arnd