linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: don't detach devices without an IOMMU during teardown
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:42:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3121960.76S1loDMb2@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150113152445.GD31784@arm.com>

Hi Will,

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 15:24:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 02:53:44PM +0000, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 12 January 2015 17:23:33 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > When tearing down the DMA ops for a device via of_dma_deconfigure, we
> > > unconditionally detach the device from its IOMMU domain. For devices
> > > that aren't actually behind an IOMMU, this produces a "Not attached"
> > > warning message on the console.
> > > 
> > > This patch changes the teardown code so that we don't detach from the
> > > IOMMU domain when there isn't an IOMMU dma mapping to start with.
> > > 
> > > Repoerted-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > I might have reported the problem, but I haven't repoerted it :-)
> 
> D'oh, fat fingers. Sorry!
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > index 7864797609b3..711c3d2802fb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > > @@ -2023,7 +2023,10 @@ static bool arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(struct device
> > > *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> > > 
> > >  static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > >  {
> > > 
> > > -	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = dev->archdata.mapping;
> > > +	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev);
> > 
> > As the function is already protected by an #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
> > is there a specific reason for this change ?
> 
> I just wanted to hide the archdata access, since we shouldn't really care
> where it's stored. I could do it as a seperate patch, but I was in the
> area...

No issue about that, but you could then send another patch to replace all 
direct references to dev->archdata.mapping in the file.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

      reply	other threads:[~2015-01-13 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-12 17:23 [PATCH 0/2] A couple of DMA teardown fixes for 3.19 Will Deacon
2015-01-12 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] of/platform: teardown DMA mappings on device destruction Will Deacon
2015-01-12 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: don't detach devices without an IOMMU during teardown Will Deacon
2015-01-13 14:53   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-13 15:24     ` Will Deacon
2015-01-13 15:42       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3121960.76S1loDMb2@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).