From: elder@linaro.org (Alex Elder)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to disable compiler auto-inline optimizations
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 05:12:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <314bb2b3-186e-d7b0-d800-f77a42fd80fa@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607091923.n5q5uzsxuymy3vov@vireshk-i7>
On 06/07/2018 04:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-06-18, 11:18, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> If you want to work around the warning and think you can do it in some
>> non-contrived way, then go for it.
>>
>> Clearing the request buffer, checking for termination using strnlen, and
>> then using memcpy might not be too bad.
>>
>> But after all, it is a false positive, so leaving things as they stand
>> is fine too.
>
> Leave it then :)
>
It's interesting that the warning isn't reported for this in
fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(). The difference there is
that you actually put a zero byte at that last position before
returning. I'm mildly impressed if gcc is distinguishing that.
You *are* returning the fw_info->firmware_tag array newly filled
with a non-null-terminated string in one of the two cases that
get warnings in "fw-management.c". But the other one is only
updating a buffer in a local/automatic variable.
Weird. I wish there were a non-clumsy way of marking false positives
like this as A-OK.
-Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 8:13 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] kernel hacking: GCC optimization for better debug experience (-Og) changbin.du at intel.com
2018-06-05 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] x86/mm: surround level4_kernel_pgt with #ifdef CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL...#endif changbin.du at intel.com
2018-06-05 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to disable compiler auto-inline optimizations changbin.du at intel.com
2018-06-05 21:21 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-06 13:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-06 14:26 ` Johan Hovold
2018-06-06 18:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-07 4:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-06-07 7:46 ` Du, Changbin
2018-06-07 8:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-06-07 9:03 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2018-06-07 9:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-06-07 9:18 ` Johan Hovold
2018-06-07 9:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-06-07 10:12 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2018-06-07 10:27 ` Johan Hovold
2018-06-08 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-11 15:46 ` Johan Hovold
2018-06-07 8:06 ` Johan Hovold
2018-06-05 21:34 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-06 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-05 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: mm: fix build error in fix_to_virt with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING changbin.du at intel.com
2018-06-05 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] kernel hacking: new config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING to apply GCC -Og optimization changbin.du at intel.com
2018-06-10 10:44 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-10 15:49 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-11 16:00 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=314bb2b3-186e-d7b0-d800-f77a42fd80fa@linaro.org \
--to=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).