From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:39:26 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] kvm: arm/arm64: Fix locking for kvm_free_stage2_pgd
In-Reply-To: <20170315092147.GM1277@cbox>
References: <1489503154-20705-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <1489503154-20705-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <20170315092147.GM1277@cbox>
Message-ID: <314fbde3-17e6-414b-85e6-326de22bdc1c@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 15/03/17 09:21, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:52:34PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> In kvm_free_stage2_pgd() we don't hold the kvm->mmu_lock while calling
>> unmap_stage2_range() on the entire memory range for the guest. This could
>> cause problems with other callers (e.g, munmap on a memslot) trying to
>> unmap a range.
>>
>> Fixes: commit d5d8184d35c9 ("KVM: ARM: Memory virtualization setup")
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # v3.10+
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 13b9c1f..b361f71 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -831,7 +831,10 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  	if (kvm->arch.pgd == NULL)
>>  		return;
>>  
>> +	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>  	unmap_stage2_range(kvm, 0, KVM_PHYS_SIZE);
>> +	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> +
> 
> This ends up holding the spin lock for potentially quite a while, where
> we can do things like __flush_dcache_area(), which I think can fault.

I believe we're always using the linear mapping (or kmap on 32bit) in
order not to fault.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...