From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Hubert Feurstein <hubert.feurstein@contec.at>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:45:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31d57d94-9701-1c46-6ce2-c43eaa16f444@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0FfTjNAvJG1yUi==bLBjeVaJ0oseaqs-ZouZKHrFdBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
On 20/10/2019 13:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Ah, that makes sense. so all interrupt numbers need to
>>> be shifted by a fixed number (e.g. 1) like we did for
>>> other platforms (see attachment).
>> Yes, the below patch resolved both GPIO and DMA issues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Previous patch (selecting IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY) is not
>> required.
>>
>> If you re-spin all 3 ep93xx-relevant patches together, you can put my
>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
>> on them.
> Awesome, thanks for testing.
>
> I only remember sending two patches for ep93xx:
> ARM: ep93xx: make mach/ep93xx-regs.h local
> ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ
>
> and have added the Tested-by tag to them now. Is there a third one
> I missed?
The patch shifting the IRQ-numbering by one is a prerequisite for the two
above patches, right?
--
Alex.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-20 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 16:29 [PATCH 1/6] ARM: versatile: move integrator/realview/vexpress to versatile Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ep93xx: enable SPARSE_IRQ Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-19 16:42 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2019-10-19 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-19 20:24 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2019-10-19 20:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-19 21:14 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2019-10-20 11:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-20 21:45 ` Alexander Sverdlin [this message]
2019-10-21 6:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ep93xx: make mach/ep93xx-regs.h local Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dove: multiplatform support Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: orion/mv78xx0/dove: move to a common directory Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: orion: unify Makefile/Kconfig files Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-18 19:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-10-18 19:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-11-04 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: versatile: move integrator/realview/vexpress to versatile Linus Walleij
2019-11-04 15:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-04 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-11-05 16:57 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31d57d94-9701-1c46-6ce2-c43eaa16f444@gmail.com \
--to=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=hubert.feurstein@contec.at \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).