From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C645C3B188 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227862082F for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="XWIdBgOm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 227862082F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jcbL4puu8B0JYZLujldgrCrT2lz3mFPIBNGajrj3zwY=; b=XWIdBgOmO5WRPh rZl3luMriwuPVWyVSYtcTpt5hWgVObhB4uZcvVI7yMMVE7jbIq6H76af15bjmUEHnGke+1unhdLzX eLjYllKuunnbZp7MKdRntMbsx54jx8upxq4i391SMNvlcpDxSSHhptJqT0k+bAc5FUMuvUjxPowRT O5fhYYVOUr7+RwG05G1jSBpFzKr9UViin3dZxYcFxY1wXemi50szDvkQ13PF+OzDjdWUW9D1hMx3y a5yy2sIVbvFBpQS5iheLnsBOo2VhtHJBIgW8riII7tBsN1PzOFy7mDIjWeW7fd4Rr5dhm00fbGrlO GFMacMNOGqya3OEoCt1w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j1ql9-0002CC-9f; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:04:51 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j1qkf-0001Zb-5N; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:04:24 +0000 Received: from p508fd8fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.143.216.254] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j1qkU-0007ts-5l; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:04:10 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: rockchip: convert rk3399 pll type to use readl_poll_timeout Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:04:09 +0100 Message-ID: <3214502.EbdgFk5LkT@phil> In-Reply-To: <20200129163821.1547295-1-heiko@sntech.de> References: <20200129163821.1547295-1-heiko@sntech.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200212_040421_423462_D08C779B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sboyd@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2020, 17:38:19 CET schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > From: Heiko Stuebner > > Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the > handy readl_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally > blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're > not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4 > and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner applied all 3 for 5.7 with Stephen's Review _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel