From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] multi_v7_defconfig: Remove CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:58:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3227508.0XRP5bODaT@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0301MB0867E1E1BD7FAE068207AC02FE0E0@BN3PR0301MB0867.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Wednesday 02 December 2015 02:12:18 Huan Wang wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 December 2015 09:35:45 Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > multi_v7_defconfig is not suitable for booting LS1021 as it needs
> > > LPAE.
> > >
> > > Remove this option.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> >
> > This needs a better explanation. Why do we need LPAE for this platform?
> >
> >
> [Alison Wang] Because PCIE, IFC region 2, DRAM2 and other IPs on LS1021A
> are in the 40-bit address space, so we need to enable LPAE to access those
> memory beyond the 4GB limit.
>
> Let me summarize the current status. I have made multi_v7_lpae_defconfig to
> support LS1021A according to the suggestion from Russell King. Olof Johansson
> said they have discussed it before and they have chosen to just have a
> multi_v7_defconfig. Attached is the discussion. There is not further
> solution about the discussion.
>
> So now, I suggest to remain LS1021A in multi_v7_defconfig at least.
I think that's fine for the time being. We are still looking for
a good way to deal with LPAE configurations in general.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 11:35 [PATCH v2] multi_v7_defconfig: Remove CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A Fabio Estevam
2015-12-01 11:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-02 2:12 ` Huan Wang
2015-12-02 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3227508.0XRP5bODaT@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).