From: poza@codeaurora.org (poza at codeaurora.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] PCI: Mask and unmask hotplug interrupts during reset
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:22:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <324f8cf2fe6f7bdc43ca8a646eea908d@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703083447.GA2689@wunner.de>
On 2018-07-03 14:04, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:52:47PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> If a bridge supports hotplug and observes a PCIe fatal error, the
>> following
>> events happen:
>>
>> 1. AER driver removes the devices from PCI tree on fatal error
>> 2. AER driver brings down the link by issuing a secondary bus reset
>> waits
>> for the link to come up.
>> 3. Hotplug driver observes a link down interrupt
>> 4. Hotplug driver tries to remove the devices waiting for the rescan
>> lock
>> but devices are already removed by the AER driver and AER driver is
>> waiting
>> for the link to come back up.
>> 5. AER driver tries to re-enumerate devices after polling for the link
>> state to go up.
>> 6. Hotplug driver obtains the lock and tries to remove the devices
>> again.
>>
>> If a bridge is a hotplug capable bridge, mask hotplug interrupts
>> before the
>> reset and unmask afterwards.
>
> Would it work for you if you just amended the AER driver to skip
> removal and re-enumeration of devices if the port is a hotplug bridge?
> Just check for is_hotplug_bridge in struct pci_dev.
>
I tend to agree with you Lukas.
on this line I already have follow up patches
although I am waiting for Bjorn to review some patch-series before that.
[PATCH v2 0/6] Fix issues and cleanup for ERR_FATAL and ERR_NONFATAL
It doesn't look to me a an entirely a race condition since its guarded
by pci_lock_rescan_remove())
I observed that both hotplug and aer/dpc comes out of it in a quiet sane
state.
My thinking is: Disabling hotplug interrupts during ERR_FATAL,
is something little away from natural course of link_down event
handling, which is handled by pciehp more maturely.
so it would be just easy not to take any action e.g. removal and
re-enumeration of devices from ERR_FATAL handling point of view.
I leave it to Bjorn.
follwing is the patch wich I am trying to set it right and under test.
so till now I am in an opinion to handle this by checking in err.c
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
index 410c35c..607a234 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
@@ -292,15 +292,17 @@ void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
u32 service)
parent = udev->subordinate;
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
- list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pdev, temp, &parent->devices,
- bus_list) {
- pci_dev_get(pdev);
- pci_dev_set_disconnected(pdev, NULL);
- if (pci_has_subordinate(pdev))
- pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate,
- pci_dev_set_disconnected, NULL);
- pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
- pci_dev_put(pdev);
+ if (!udev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pdev, temp,
&parent->devices,
+ bus_list) {
+ pci_dev_get(pdev);
+ pci_dev_set_disconnected(pdev, NULL);
+ if (pci_has_subordinate(pdev))
+ pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate,
+ pci_dev_set_disconnected,
NULL);
+ pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
+ pci_dev_put(pdev);
+ }
}
result = reset_link(udev, service);
@@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, u32
service)
}
if (result == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
- if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true))
+ if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true) &&
!udev->is_hotplug_bridge)
pci_rescan_bus(udev->bus);
pci_info(dev, "Device recovery from fatal error
successful\n");
dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
> That would seem like a much simpler solution, given that it is known
> that the link will flap on reset, causing the hotplug driver to remove
> and re-enumerate devices. That would also cover cases where hotplug is
> handled by a different driver than pciehp, or by the platform firmware.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-03 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 22:52 [PATCH V5 0/3] PCI: separate hotplug handling from fatal error handling Sinan Kaya
2018-07-02 22:52 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] PCI: pciehp: implement mask and unmask interrupt functions Sinan Kaya
2018-07-02 22:52 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] PCI: pciehp: reuse pciehp_mask/unmask_irq() in reset_slot() Sinan Kaya
2018-07-02 22:52 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] PCI: Mask and unmask hotplug interrupts during reset Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <20180703083447.GA2689@wunner.de>
2018-07-03 10:52 ` poza at codeaurora.org [this message]
2018-07-03 12:04 ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-07-03 11:30 ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-07-03 13:11 ` poza at codeaurora.org
2018-07-03 13:25 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-03 13:31 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <20180703135956.GA18639@wunner.de>
2018-07-03 14:10 ` poza at codeaurora.org
2018-07-03 15:34 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <20180703141255.GB18639@wunner.de>
2018-07-03 14:29 ` poza at codeaurora.org
[not found] ` <20180703143434.GA4086@wunner.de>
2018-07-03 15:12 ` poza at codeaurora.org
2018-07-03 15:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-03 15:43 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <20180708171418.GA11476@wunner.de>
2018-07-09 14:48 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <20180709160008.GA1490@wunner.de>
2018-07-10 18:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-20 20:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-21 2:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-21 6:07 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-25 8:29 ` poza at codeaurora.org
2018-07-31 18:44 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] PCI: separate hotplug handling from fatal error handling Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-31 18:54 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-07-31 20:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=324f8cf2fe6f7bdc43ca8a646eea908d@codeaurora.org \
--to=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).